Post-Quantum Authentication in TLS 1.3: A Performance Study
Dimitrios Sikeridis, Panos Kampanakis, Michael Devetsikiotis
Abstract
—The potential development of large-scale quantum computers is raising concerns among IT and security research professionals due to their ability to solve (elliptic curve) discrete logarithm and integer factorization problems in polynomial time. All currently used public key algorithms would be deemed insecure in a post-quantum (PQ) setting. In response, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has initiated a pro- cess to standardize quantum-resistant crypto algorithms, focusing primarily on their security guarantees. Since PQ algorithms present significant differences over classical ones, their overall evaluation should not be performed out-of-context. This work presents a detailed performance evaluation of the NIST signature algorithm candidates and investigates the imposed latency on TLS 1.3 connection establishment under realistic network conditions. In addition, we investigate their impact on TLS session throughput and analyze the trade-off between lengthy PQ signatures and computationally heavy PQ cryptographic operations. Our results demonstrate that the adoption of at least two PQ signature algorithms would be viable with little additional overhead over current signature algorithms. Also, we argue that many NIST PQ candidates can effectively be used for less time- sensitive applications, and provide an in-depth discussion on the integration of PQ authentication in encrypted tunneling protocols, along with the related challenges, improvements, and alternatives. Finally, we propose and evaluate the combination of different PQ signature algorithms across the same certificate chain in TLS. Results show a reduction of the TLS handshake time and a significant increase of a server’s TLS tunnel connection rate over using a single PQ signature scheme.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8dc9a643-3fa7-45e6-ae25-41d1949b3298Cited by top-tier papers3
- Post-Quantum TLS Without Handshake SignaturesPeter Schwabe, Douglas Stebila, Thom WiggersCCS 2020 · 162 citations
- A Tale of Two Worlds, a Formal Story of WireGuard HybridizationPascal Lafourcade, Dhekra Mahmoud, Sylvain Ruhault, Abdul Rahman TalebUSENIX Security 2025
- Looma: A Low-Latency PQTLS Authentication Architecture for Cloud ApplicationsXinshu Ma, Michio HondaNDSS 2026
Builds on2
- A Comprehensive Symbolic Analysis of TLS 1.3Cas Cremers, Marko Horvat, Jonathan Hoyland, Sam Scott et al.CCS 2017 · 247 citations
- Automated Analysis and Verification of TLS 1.3: 0-RTT, Resumption and Delayed AuthenticationCas Cremers, Marko Horvat, Sam Scott, Thyla van der MerweS&P 2016 · 128 citations
Related papers
- OpenSSLNTRU: Faster post-quantum TLS key exchangeDaniel J. Bernstein, Billy Bob Brumley, Ming-Shing Chen, Nicola TuveriUSENIX Security 2022
- Quorus: Efficient, Scalable Threshold ML-DSA Signatures from MPCAlexander Bienstock, Leo de Castro, Daniel Escudero, Antigoni Polychroniadou et al.USENIX Security 2026 · 1 citation
- ExpressPQDelivery: Toward Efficient and Immediately Deployable Post-Quantum Key Delivery for Web-of-ThingsJane Kim, Jung-Hun Kang, Hyunwoo Lee, Seung-Hyun SeoWWW 2025 · 1 citation
- SQIsign2DPush: Faster Signature Scheme Using 2-Dimensional IsogeniesKohei Nakagawa, Hiroshi OnukiEUROCRYPT 2026 · 3 citations
- When Cryptography Needs a Hand: Practical Post-Quantum Authentication for V2V CommunicationsGeoff Twardokus, Nina Bindel, Hanif Rahbari, Sarah McCarthyNDSS 2024
