Automated Analysis and Verification of TLS 1.3: 0-RTT, Resumption and Delayed Authentication
Cas Cremers, Marko Horvat, Sam Scott, Thyla van der Merwe
Abstract
After a development process of many months, the TLS 1.3 specification is nearly complete. To prevent past mistakes, this crucial security protocol must be thoroughly scrutinised prior to deployment. In this work we model and analyse revision 10 of the TLS 1.3 specification using the Tamarin prover, a tool for the automated analysis of security protocols. We specify and analyse the interaction of various handshake modes for an unbounded number of concurrent TLS sessions. We show that revision 10 meets the goals of authenticated key exchange in both the unilateral and mutual authentication cases. We extend our model to incorporate the desired delayed client authentication mechanism, a feature that is likely to be included in the next revision of the specification, and uncover a potential attack in which an adversary is able to successfully impersonate a client during a PSK-resumption handshake. This observation was reported to, and confirmed by, the IETF TLS Working Group. Our work not only provides the first supporting evidence for the security of several complex protocol mode interactions in TLS 1.3, but also shows the strict necessity of recent suggestions to include more information in the protocol's signature contents.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 527812ee-e745-42eb-b0aa-99e4ef459c72Cited by top-tier papers27
- A Formal Analysis of 5G AuthenticationDavid A. Basin, Jannik Dreier, Lucca Hirschi, Sasa Radomirovic et al.CCS 2018 · 428 citations
- A Comprehensive Symbolic Analysis of TLS 1.3Cas Cremers, Marko Horvat, Jonathan Hoyland, Sam Scott et al.CCS 2017 · 247 citations
- Verified Models and Reference Implementations for the TLS 1.3 Standard CandidateKarthikeyan Bhargavan, Bruno Blanchet, Nadim KobeissiS&P 2017 · 233 citations
- SoK: Computer-Aided CryptographyManuel Barbosa, Gilles Barthe, Karthik Bhargavan, Bruno Blanchet et al.S&P 2021 · 169 citations
- Seems Legit: Automated Analysis of Subtle Attacks on Protocols that Use SignaturesDennis Jackson, Cas Cremers, Katriel Cohn-Gordon, Ralf SasseCCS 2019 · 53 citations
Related papers
- Multiple Handshakes Security of TLS 1.3 CandidatesXinyu Li, Jing Xu, Zhenfeng Zhang, Dengguo Feng et al.S&P 2016 · 32 citations
- On the Concrete Security of TLS 1.3 PSK ModeHannah Davis, Denis Diemert, Felix Günther, Tibor JagerEUROCRYPT 2022 · 19 citations
- Formally Verifying the State Machine of TLS 1.3 Handshake in OpenSSLJingjing Guan, Hui Li, Xiangdong Li, Xiaolei Wang et al.INFOCOM 2025 · 3 citations
- A Unilateral-to-Mutual Authentication Compiler for Key Exchange (with Applications to Client Authentication in TLS 1.3)Hugo KrawczykCCS 2016 · 24 citations
- Downgrade Resilience in Key-Exchange ProtocolsKarthikeyan Bhargavan, Christina Brzuska, Cédric Fournet, Matthew Green et al.S&P 2016 · 54 citations
