The Geometry of Neural Nets' Parameter Spaces Under Reparametrization
Agustinus Kristiadi, Felix Dangel, Philipp Hennig
Abstract
Model reparametrization, which follows the change-of-variable rule of calculus, is a popular way to improve the training of neural nets. But it can also be problematic since it can induce inconsistencies in, e.g., Hessian-based flatness measures, optimization trajectories, and modes of probability densities. This complicates downstream analyses: e.g. one cannot definitively relate flatness with generalization since arbitrary reparametrization changes their relationship. In this work, we study the invariance of neural nets under reparametrization from the perspective of Riemannian geometry. From this point of view, invariance is an inherent property of any neural net if one explicitly represents the metric and uses the correct associated transformation rules. This is important since although the metric is always present, it is often implicitly assumed as identity, and thus dropped from the notation, then lost under reparametrization. We discuss implications for measuring the flatness of minima, optimization, and for probability-density maximization. Finally, we explore some interesting directions where invariance is useful.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 89620bdc-74a9-412c-bf96-096b574fa761Cited by top-tier papers6
- Reparameterization invariance in approximate Bayesian inferenceHrittik Roy, Marco Miani, Carl Henrik Ek, Philipp Hennig et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 20 citations
- Riemannian Laplace approximations for Bayesian neural networksFederico Bergamin, Pablo Moreno-Muñoz, Søren Hauberg, Georgios ArvanitidisNeurIPS 2023 · 18 citations
- A Tale of Two Symmetries: Exploring the Loss Landscape of Equivariant ModelsYuqing Xie, Tess E. SmidtNeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Hide & Seek: Transformer Symmetries Obscure Sharpness & Riemannian Geometry Finds ItMarvin F. da Silva, Felix Dangel, Sageev OoreICML 2025
- Sharper Convergence Rates for Nonconvex Optimisation via Reduction MappingsEvan Markou, Thalaiyasingam Ajanthan, Stephen GouldNeurIPS 2025
Builds on17
- Sharpness-aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving GeneralizationPierre Foret, Ariel Kleiner, Hossein Mobahi, Behnam NeyshaburICLR 2021 · 1,861 citations
- Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find ThemYiding Jiang, Behnam Neyshabur, Hossein Mobahi, Dilip Krishnan et al.ICLR 2020 · 705 citations
- Laplace Redux - Effortless Bayesian Deep LearningErik A. Daxberger, Agustinus Kristiadi, Alexander Immer, Runa Eschenhagen et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 508 citations
- Tensor Programs IV: Feature Learning in Infinite-Width Neural NetworksGreg Yang, Edward J. HuICML 2021 · 242 citations
- Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep LearningAlexander Immer, Matthias Bauer, Vincent Fortuin, Gunnar Rätsch et al.ICML 2021 · 130 citations
Related papers
- A Reparametrization-Invariant Sharpness Measure Based on Information GeometryCheongjae Jang, Sungyoon Lee, Frank C. Park, Yung-Kyun NohNeurIPS 2022 · 19 citations
- Relative Flatness and GeneralizationHenning Petzka, Michael Kamp, Linara Adilova, Cristian Sminchisescu et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 114 citations
- Deep Networks on Toroids: Removing Symmetries Reveals the Structure of Flat Regions in the Landscape GeometryFabrizio Pittorino, Antonio Ferraro, Gabriele Perugini, Christoph Feinauer et al.ICML 2022 · 30 citations
- In What Ways Are Deep Neural Networks Invariant and How Should We Measure This?Henry Kvinge, Tegan Emerson, Grayson Jorgenson, Scott Vasquez et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 15 citations
- Normalized Flat Minima: Exploring Scale Invariant Definition of Flat Minima for Neural Networks Using PAC-Bayesian AnalysisYusuke Tsuzuku, Issei Sato, Masashi SugiyamaICML 2020 · 91 citations
