Reparameterization invariance in approximate Bayesian inference
Hrittik Roy, Marco Miani, Carl Henrik Ek, Philipp Hennig, Marvin Pförtner, Lukas Tatzel, Søren Hauberg
Abstract
Current approximate posteriors in Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) exhibit a crucial limitation: they fail to maintain invariance under reparameterization, i.e. BNNs assign different posterior densities to different parametrizations of identical functions. This creates a fundamental flaw in the application of Bayesian principles as it breaks the correspondence between uncertainty over the parameters with uncertainty over the parametrized function. In this paper, we investigate this issue in the context of the increasingly popular linearized Laplace approximation. Specifically, it has been observed that linearized predictives alleviate the common underfitting problems of the Laplace approximation. We develop a new geometric view of reparametrizations from which we explain the success of linearization. Moreover, we demonstrate that these reparameterization invariance properties can be extended to the original neural network predictive using a Riemannian diffusion process giving a straightforward algorithm for approximate posterior sampling, which empirically improves posterior fit.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 49cdc778-4ed9-4b69-8685-64e3f4c9e222Cited by top-tier papers9
- Sketched Lanczos uncertainty score: a low-memory summary of the Fisher informationMarco Miani, Lorenzo Beretta, Søren HaubergNeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- Richer Bayesian Last Layers with Subsampled NTK FeaturesSergio Calvo Ordoñez, Jonathan Plenk, Richard Bergna, Alvaro Cartea et al.ICML 2026 · 4 citations
- VIKING: Deep variational inference with stochastic projectionsSamuel Matthiesen, Hrittik Roy, Nicholas Krämer, Yevgen Zainchkovskyy et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- ELBOing Stein: Variational Bayes with Stein Mixture InferenceOla Rønning, Eric T. Nalisnick, Christophe Ley, Padhraic Smyth et al.ICLR 2025
- Bayesian Optimization via Continual Variational Last Layer TrainingPaul Brunzema, Mikkel Jordahn, John Willes, Sebastian Trimpe et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on18
- Laplace Redux - Effortless Bayesian Deep LearningErik A. Daxberger, Agustinus Kristiadi, Alexander Immer, Runa Eschenhagen et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 508 citations
- Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU NetworksAgustinus Kristiadi, Matthias Hein, Philipp HennigICML 2020 · 344 citations
- On the linearity of large non-linear models: when and why the tangent kernel is constantChaoyue Liu, Libin Zhu, Mikhail BelkinNeurIPS 2020 · 183 citations
- Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep LearningAlexander Immer, Matthias Bauer, Vincent Fortuin, Gunnar Rätsch et al.ICML 2021 · 130 citations
- What Happens after SGD Reaches Zero Loss? --A Mathematical FrameworkZhiyuan Li, Tianhao Wang, Sanjeev AroraICLR 2022 · 121 citations
Related papers
- Riemannian Laplace approximations for Bayesian neural networksFederico Bergamin, Pablo Moreno-Muñoz, Søren Hauberg, Georgios ArvanitidisNeurIPS 2023 · 18 citations
- On the detrimental effect of invariances in the likelihood for variational inferenceRichard Kurle, Ralf Herbrich, Tim Januschowski, Yuyang Wang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 10 citations
- Variational Linearized Laplace Approximation for Bayesian Deep LearningLuis A. Ortega Andrés, Simón Rodríguez Santana, Daniel Hernández-LobatoICML 2024 · 12 citations
- Dangers of Bayesian Model Averaging under Covariate ShiftPavel Izmailov, Patrick Nicholson, Sanae Lotfi, Andrew Gordon WilsonNeurIPS 2021 · 51 citations
- Bayesian Deep Learning via Subnetwork InferenceErik A. Daxberger, Eric T. Nalisnick, James Urquhart Allingham, Javier Antorán et al.ICML 2021 · 108 citations
