A Reparametrization-Invariant Sharpness Measure Based on Information Geometry
Cheongjae Jang, Sungyoon Lee, Frank C. Park, Yung-Kyun Noh
Abstract
It has been observed that the generalization performance of neural networks correlates with the sharpness of their loss landscape. Dinh et al. (2017) [8] have observed that existing formulations of sharpness measures fail to be invariant with respect to scaling and reparametrization. While some scale-invariant measures have recently been proposed, reparametrization-invariant measures are still lacking. Moreover, they often do not provide any theoretical insights into generalization performance nor lead to practical use to improve the performance. Based on an information geometric analysis of the neural network parameter space, in this paper we propose a reparametrization-invariant sharpness measure that captures the change in loss with respect to changes in the probability distribution modeled by neural networks, rather than with respect to changes in the parameter values. We reveal some theoretical connections of our measure to generalization performance. In particular, experiments confirm that using our measure as a regularizer in neural network training significantly improves performance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers7
- The Geometry of Neural Nets' Parameter Spaces Under ReparametrizationAgustinus Kristiadi, Felix Dangel, Philipp HennigNeurIPS 2023 · 21 citations
- Reparameterization invariance in approximate Bayesian inferenceHrittik Roy, Marco Miani, Carl Henrik Ek, Philipp Hennig et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 20 citations
- Differentially Private Sharpness-Aware TrainingJinseong Park, Hoki Kim, Yujin Choi, Jaewook LeeICML 2023 · 15 citations
- A Universal Class of Sharpness-Aware Minimization AlgorithmsBehrooz Tahmasebi, Ashkan Soleymani, Dara Bahri, Stefanie Jegelka et al.ICML 2024 · 13 citations
- Riemannian SAM: Sharpness-Aware Minimization on Riemannian ManifoldsJihun Yun, Eunho YangNeurIPS 2023 · 10 citations
Builds on9
- Sharpness-aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving GeneralizationPierre Foret, Ariel Kleiner, Hossein Mobahi, Behnam NeyshaburICLR 2021 · 1,861 citations
- Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find ThemYiding Jiang, Behnam Neyshabur, Hossein Mobahi, Dilip Krishnan et al.ICLR 2020 · 705 citations
- ASAM: Adaptive Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Scale-Invariant Learning of Deep Neural NetworksJungmin Kwon, Jeongseop Kim, Hyunseo Park, In Kwon ChoiICML 2021 · 385 citations
- On the Origin of Implicit Regularization in Stochastic Gradient DescentSamuel L. Smith, Benoit Dherin, David G. T. Barrett, Soham DeICLR 2021 · 235 citations
- Implicit Gradient RegularizationDavid G. T. Barrett, Benoit DherinICLR 2021 · 235 citations
Related papers
- A Modern Look at the Relationship between Sharpness and GeneralizationMaksym Andriushchenko, Francesco Croce, Maximilian Müller, Matthias Hein et al.ICML 2023 · 92 citations
- Rényi Sharpness: A Novel Sharpness that Strongly Correlates with GeneralizationQiaozhe Zhang, Jun Sun, Yingzhuang LiuICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Sharpness-Aware Training for FreeJiawei Du, Daquan Zhou, Jiashi Feng, Vincent Y. F. Tan et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 132 citations
- Relative Flatness and GeneralizationHenning Petzka, Michael Kamp, Linara Adilova, Cristian Sminchisescu et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 114 citations
- Hide & Seek: Transformer Symmetries Obscure Sharpness & Riemannian Geometry Finds ItMarvin F. da Silva, Felix Dangel, Sageev OoreICML 2025
