Lune

ACL Findings2026

µsicalnote Something Just Like TRuST µsicalnote *: Toxicity Recognition of Span and Target

Berk Atil, Namrata Sureddy, Rebecca J. Passonneau

Abstract

Toxic language includes content that is offensive, abusive, or that promotes harm. Progress in preventing toxic output from large language models (LLMs) is hampered by inconsistent definitions of toxicity. We introduce TRuST, a large-scale dataset that unifies and expands prior resources through a carefully synthesized definition of toxicity, and corresponding annotation scheme. It consists of ∼300k annotations, with high-quality human annotation on ∼11k. To ensure high-quality, we designed a rigorous, multi-stage human annotation process, and evaluated the diversity of the annotators. Then we benchmarked state-of-the-art LLMs and pre-trained models on three tasks: toxicity detection, identification of the target group, and of toxic words. Our results indicate that fine-tuned PLMs outperform LLMs on the three tasks, and that current reasoning models do not reliably improve performance. TRuST constitutes one of the most comprehensive resources for evaluating and mitigating LLM toxicity, and other research in sociallyaware and safer language technologies. Disclaimer: Due to the topic studied here, the paper contains examples of offensive language.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on24

  1. Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
  2. Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
  3. RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language ModelsSamuel Gehman, Suchin Gururangan, Maarten Sap, Yejin Choi et al.EMNLP Findings 2020 · 692 citations
  4. Chain of Preference Optimization: Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMsXuan Zhang, Chao Du, Tianyu Pang, Qian Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 177 citations
  5. Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate SpeechMai ElSherief, Caleb Ziems, David Muchlinski, Vaishnavi Anupindi et al.EMNLP 2021 · 159 citations

Related papers

  1. Realistic Evaluation of Toxicity in Large Language ModelsTinh Son Luong, Thanh-Thien Le, Linh Ngo Van, Thien Huu NguyenACL Findings 2024 · 14 citations
  2. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
  3. Trust The TypicalDebargha Ganguly, Sreehari Sankar, Biyao Zhang, Vikash Singh et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
  4. Tensor Trust: Interpretable Prompt Injection Attacks from an Online GameSam Toyer, Olivia Watkins, Ethan Adrian Mendes, Justin Svegliato et al.ICLR 2024 · 123 citations
  5. Can LLMs Recognize Toxicity? A Structured Investigation Framework and Toxicity MetricHyukhun Koh, Dohyung Kim, Minwoo Lee, Kyomin JungEMNLP Findings 2024 · 10 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines