I2Q: A Fully Decentralized Q-Learning Algorithm
Jiechuan Jiang, Zongqing Lu
Abstract
Fully decentralized multi-agent reinforcement learning has shown great potential for many real-world cooperative tasks, where the global information, e.g., the actions of other agents, is not accessible. Although independent Q-learning is widely used for decentralized training, the transition probabilities are non-stationary since other agents are updating policies simultaneously, which leads to non-guaranteed convergence of independent Q-learning. To deal with non-stationarity, we first introduce stationary ideal transition probabilities, on which independent Q-learning could converge to the global optimum. Further, we propose a fully decentralized method, I2Q, which performs independent Q-learning on the modeled ideal transition function to reach the global optimum. The modeling of ideal transition function in I2Q is fully decentralized and independent from the learned policies of other agents, helping I2Q be free from non-stationarity and learn the optimal policy. Empirically, we show that I2Q can achieve remarkable improvement in a variety of cooperative multi-agent tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8772dac6-8f5a-4863-89cc-6348279b2f81Cited by top-tier papers4
- Opponent Modeling based on Subgoal InferenceXiaopeng Yu, Jiechuan Jiang, Zongqing LuNeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- In-Context Fully Decentralized Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningChao Li, Bingkun Bao, Yang GaoNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Decoupled SGDA for Games with Intermittent Strategy CommunicationAli Zindari, Parham Yazdkhasti, Anton Rodomanov, Tatjana Chavdarova et al.ICML 2025
- Value Aggregation with Uncertainty in Online Decentralized MARLZiyue Chu, Leonardo StellaICML 2026
Builds on9
- Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningTabish Rashid, Gregory Farquhar, Bei Peng, Shimon WhitesonNeurIPS 2020 · 1,960 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-LearningJianhao Wang, Zhizhou Ren, Terry Liu, Yang Yu et al.ICLR 2021 · 595 citations
- FACMAC: Factored Multi-Agent Centralised Policy GradientsBei Peng, Tabish Rashid, Christian Schröder de Witt, Pierre-Alexandre Kamienny et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 399 citations
- Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningJakub Grudzien Kuba, Ruiqing Chen, Muning Wen, Ying Wen et al.ICLR 2022 · 367 citations
Related papers
- Decentralized Q-learning in Zero-sum Markov GamesMuhammed O. Sayin, Kaiqing Zhang, David S. Leslie, Tamer Basar et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 105 citations
- Finite-Time Global Optimality Convergence in Deep Neural Actor-Critic Methods for Decentralized Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningZhiyao Zhang, Myeung Suk Oh, Hairi, Ziyue Luo et al.ICML 2025
- More Centralized Training, Still Decentralized Execution: Multi-Agent Conditional Policy FactorizationJiangxing Wang, Deheng Ye, Zongqing LuICLR 2023 · 5 citations
- Multi-Agent Determinantal Q-LearningYaodong Yang, Ying Wen, Jun Wang, Liheng Chen et al.ICML 2020 · 83 citations
- Selectively Sharing Experiences Improves Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningMatthias Gerstgrasser, Tom Danino, Sarah KerenNeurIPS 2023 · 16 citations
