More Centralized Training, Still Decentralized Execution: Multi-Agent Conditional Policy Factorization
Jiangxing Wang, Deheng Ye, Zongqing Lu
Abstract
In cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), combining value decomposition with actor-critic enables agents to learn stochastic policies, which are more suitable for the partially observable environment. Given the goal of learning local policies that enable decentralized execution, agents are commonly assumed to be independent of each other, even in centralized training. However, such an assumption may prohibit agents from learning the optimal joint policy. To address this problem, we explicitly take the dependency among agents into centralized training. Although this leads to the optimal joint policy, it may not be factorized for decentralized execution. Nevertheless, we theoretically show that from such a joint policy, we can always derive another joint policy that achieves the same optimality but can be factorized for decentralized execution. To this end, we propose multi-agent conditional policy factorization (MACPF), which takes more centralized training but still enables decentralized execution. We empirically verify MACPF in various cooperative MARL tasks and demonstrate that MACPF achieves better performance or faster convergence than baselines. Our code is available at https://github.com/PKU-RL/FOP-DMAC-MACPF .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers9
- Maximum Entropy Heterogeneous-Agent Reinforcement LearningJiarong Liu, Yifan Zhong, Siyi Hu, Haobo Fu et al.ICLR 2024 · 27 citations
- Attention-Guided Contrastive Role Representations for Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningZican Hu, Zongzhang Zhang, Huaxiong Li, Chunlin Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 27 citations
- Mean-Field Sampling for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningEmile Anand, Ishani Karmarkar, Guannan QuNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- Mutual-Information Regularized Multi-Agent Policy IterationJiangxing Wang, Deheng Ye, Zongqing LuNeurIPS 2023 · 9 citations
- AgentMixer: Multi-Agent Correlated Policy FactorizationZhiyuan Li, Wenshuai Zhao, Lijun Wu, Joni PajarinenAAAI 2025 · 7 citations
Builds on12
- Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningTabish Rashid, Gregory Farquhar, Bei Peng, Shimon WhitesonNeurIPS 2020 · 1,960 citations
- QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-LearningJianhao Wang, Zhizhou Ren, Terry Liu, Yang Yu et al.ICLR 2021 · 595 citations
- Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningJakub Grudzien Kuba, Ruiqing Chen, Muning Wen, Ying Wen et al.ICLR 2022 · 367 citations
- Deep Coordination GraphsWendelin Boehmer, Vitaly Kurin, Shimon WhitesonICML 2020 · 209 citations
- Value-Decomposition Multi-Agent Actor-CriticsJianyu Su, Stephen C. Adams, Peter A. BelingAAAI 2021 · 140 citations
Related papers
- Potentially Optimal Joint Actions Recognition for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningChang Huang, Shatong Zhu, Junqiao Zhao, Hongtu Zhou et al.ICLR 2026
- Automata-Conditioned Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningBeyazit Yalcinkaya, Marcell Vazquez-Chanlatte, Ameesh Shah, Hanna Krasowski et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Revisiting Some Common Practices in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningWei Fu, Chao Yu, Zelai Xu, Jiaqi Yang et al.ICML 2022 · 49 citations
- FOP: Factorizing Optimal Joint Policy of Maximum-Entropy Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningTianhao Zhang, Yueheng Li, Chen Wang, Guangming Xie et al.ICML 2021 · 88 citations
- Multi-Agent Guided Policy OptimizationYueheng Li, Guangming Xie, Zongqing LuICLR 2026 · 4 citations
