Information bottleneck theory of high-dimensional regression: relevancy, efficiency and optimality
Vudtiwat Ngampruetikorn, David J. Schwab
Abstract
Avoiding overfitting is a central challenge in machine learning, yet many large neural networks readily achieve zero training loss. This puzzling contradiction necessitates new approaches to the study of overfitting. Here we quantify overfitting via residual information, defined as the bits in fitted models that encode noise in training data. Information efficient learning algorithms minimize residual information while maximizing the relevant bits, which are predictive of the unknown generative models. We solve this optimization to obtain the information content of optimal algorithms for a linear regression problem and compare it to that of randomized ridge regression. Our results demonstrate the fundamental trade-off between residual and relevant information and characterize the relative information efficiency of randomized regression with respect to optimal algorithms. Finally, using results from random matrix theory, we reveal the information complexity of learning a linear map in high dimensions and unveil information-theoretic analogs of double and multiple descent phenomena.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 86b3771e-4ccb-4ed3-9d26-07dd97458042Cited by top-tier papers5
- Cauchy-Schwarz Divergence Information Bottleneck for RegressionShujian Yu, Xi Yu, Sigurd Løkse, Robert Jenssen et al.ICLR 2024 · 16 citations
- DSD²: Can We Dodge Sparse Double Descent and Compress the Neural Network Worry-Free?Victor Quétu, Enzo TartaglioneAAAI 2024 · 6 citations
- Generalization vs Specialization under Concept ShiftAlex Nguyen, David J. Schwab, Vudtiwat NgampruetikornNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Blindfolded Experts Generalize Better: Insights from Robotic Manipulation and VideogamesEv Zisselman, Mirco Mutti, Shelly Francis-Meretzki, Elisei Shafer et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- A representation-learning game for classes of prediction tasksNeria Uzan, Nir WeinbergerICLR 2024 · 1 citation
Builds on12
- Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data HurtPreetum Nakkiran, Gal Kaplun, Yamini Bansal, Tristan Yang et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,108 citations
- Sharpened Generalization Bounds based on Conditional Mutual Information and an Application to Noisy, Iterative AlgorithmsMahdi Haghifam, Jeffrey Negrea, Ashish Khisti, Daniel M. Roy et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 124 citations
- Triple descent and the two kinds of overfitting: where & why do they appear?Stéphane d'Ascoli, Levent Sagun, Giulio BiroliNeurIPS 2020 · 94 citations
- An Exact Characterization of the Generalization Error for the Gibbs AlgorithmGholamali Aminian, Yuheng Bu, Laura Toni, Miguel R. D. Rodrigues et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 75 citations
- Generalization Bounds For Meta-Learning: An Information-Theoretic AnalysisQi Chen, Changjian Shui, Mario MarchandNeurIPS 2021 · 66 citations
Related papers
- Provable Benefits of Overparameterization in Model Compression: From Double Descent to Pruning Neural NetworksXiangyu Chang, Yingcong Li, Samet Oymak, Christos ThrampoulidisAAAI 2021 · 58 citations
- High-Dimensional Analysis for Generalized Nonlinear Regression: From Asymptotics to AlgorithmJian Li, Yong Liu, Weiping WangAAAI 2024 · 4 citations
- Exact expressions for double descent and implicit regularization via surrogate random designMichal Derezinski, Feynman T. Liang, Michael W. MahoneyNeurIPS 2020 · 81 citations
- On the Role of Optimization in Double Descent: A Least Squares StudyIlja Kuzborskij, Csaba Szepesvári, Omar Rivasplata, Amal Rannen-Triki et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 12 citations
- Spurious Correlations in High Dimensional Regression: The Roles of Regularization, Simplicity Bias and Over-ParameterizationSimone Bombari, Marco MondelliICML 2025
