An Exact Characterization of the Generalization Error for the Gibbs Algorithm
Gholamali Aminian, Yuheng Bu, Laura Toni, Miguel R. D. Rodrigues, Gregory W. Wornell
Abstract
Various approaches have been developed to upper bound the generalization error of a supervised learning algorithm. However, existing bounds are often loose and lack of guarantees. As a result, they may fail to characterize the exact generalization ability of a learning algorithm. Our main contribution is an exact characterization of the expected generalization error of the well-known Gibbs algorithm (a.k.a. Gibbs posterior) using symmetrized KL information between the input training samples and the output hypothesis. Our result can be applied to tighten existing expected generalization error and PAC-Bayesian bounds. Our approach is versatile, as it also characterizes the generalization error of the Gibbs algorithm with data-dependent regularizer and that of the Gibbs algorithm in the asymptotic regime, where it converges to the empirical risk minimization algorithm. Of particular relevance, our results highlight the role the symmetrized KL information plays in controlling the generalization error of the Gibbs algorithm.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers10
- Generalization Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms via the Worst-Case Data-Generating Probability MeasureXinying Zou, Samir M. Perlaza, Iñaki Esnaola, Eitan AltmanAAAI 2024 · 28 citations
- Information Theoretic Lower Bounds for Information Theoretic Upper BoundsRoi LivniNeurIPS 2023 · 19 citations
- Information bottleneck theory of high-dimensional regression: relevancy, efficiency and optimalityVudtiwat Ngampruetikorn, David J. SchwabNeurIPS 2022 · 11 citations
- Generalization Error of Graph Neural Networks in the Mean-field RegimeGholamali Aminian, Yixuan He, Gesine Reinert, Lukasz Szpruch et al.ICML 2024 · 4 citations
- Tighter CMI-Based Generalization Bounds via Stochastic Projection and QuantizationMilad Sefidgaran, Kimia Nadjahi, Abdellatif ZaidiNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on6
- Sharpened Generalization Bounds based on Conditional Mutual Information and an Application to Noisy, Iterative AlgorithmsMahdi Haghifam, Jeffrey Negrea, Ashish Khisti, Daniel M. Roy et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 124 citations
- PAC-Bayes Analysis Beyond the Usual BoundsOmar Rivasplata, Ilja Kuzborskij, Csaba Szepesvári, John Shawe-TaylorNeurIPS 2020 · 101 citations
- Conditioning and Processing: Techniques to Improve Information-Theoretic Generalization BoundsHassan Hafez-Kolahi, Zeinab Golgooni, Shohreh Kasaei, Mahdieh SoleymaniNeurIPS 2020 · 63 citations
- Adversarial Training is a Form of Data-dependent Operator Norm RegularizationKevin Roth, Yannic Kilcher, Thomas HofmannNeurIPS 2020 · 61 citations
- Tighter Expected Generalization Error Bounds via Wasserstein DistanceBorja Rodríguez Gálvez, Germán Bassi, Ragnar Thobaben, Mikael SkoglundNeurIPS 2021 · 52 citations
Related papers
- Generalization of Hamiltonian algorithmsAndreas MaurerNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
- Fast-Rate PAC-Bayesian Generalization Bounds for Meta-LearningJiechao Guan, Zhiwu LuICML 2022 · 18 citations
- Generalization of Gibbs and Langevin Monte Carlo Algorithms in the Interpolation RegimeAndreas Maurer, Erfan Mirzaei, Massimiliano PontilICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Integral Probability Metrics PAC-Bayes BoundsRon Amit, Baruch Epstein, Shay Moran, Ron MeirNeurIPS 2022 · 25 citations
- More Flexible PAC-Bayesian Meta-Learning by Learning Learning AlgorithmsHossein Zakerinia, Amin Behjati, Christoph H. LampertICML 2024 · 11 citations
