Less is More: SlimG for Accurate, Robust, and Interpretable Graph Mining
Jaemin Yoo, Meng-Chieh Lee, Shubhranshu Shekhar, Christos Faloutsos
Abstract
How can we solve semi-supervised node classification in various graphs possibly with noisy features and structures? Graph neural networks (GNNs) have succeeded in many graph mining tasks, but their generalizability to various graph scenarios is limited due to the difficulty of training, hyperparameter tuning, and the selection of a model itself. Einstein said that we should "make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler." We rephrase it into the careful simplicity principle: a carefully-designed simple model can surpass sophisticated ones in real-world graphs. Based on the principle, we propose SlimG for semi-supervised node classification, which exhibits four desirable properties: It is (a) accurate, winning or tying on 10 out of 13 real-world datasets; (b) robust, being the only one that handles all scenarios of graph data (homophily, heterophily, random structure, noisy features, etc.); (c) fast and scalable, showing up to 18 times faster training in million-scale graphs; and (d) interpretable, thanks to the linearity and sparsity. We explain the success of SlimG through a systematic study of the designs of existing GNNs, sanity checks, and comprehensive ablation studies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 86925671-4de8-4ee9-b39c-4802570e437dCited by top-tier papers7
- Breaking the Entanglement of Homophily and Heterophily in Semi-supervised Node ClassificationHenan Sun, Xunkai Li, Zhengyu Wu, Daohan Su et al.ICDE 2024 · 9 citations
- No Need to Train Your RDB Foundation ModelLinjie Xu, Yanlin Zhang, Quan Gan, Minjie Wang et al.ICML 2026 · 6 citations
- NetInfoF Framework: Measuring and Exploiting Network Usable InformationMeng-Chieh Lee, Haiyang Yu, Jian Zhang, Vassilis N. Ioannidis et al.ICLR 2024 · 2 citations
- Fully-inductive Node Classification on Arbitrary GraphsJianan Zhao, Zhaocheng Zhu, Mikhail Galkin, Hesham Mostafa et al.ICLR 2025 · 1 citation
- Parameter-Free Hypergraph Neural Network for Few-Shot Node ClassificationChaewoon Bae, Doyun Choi, Jaehyun Lee, Jaemin YooNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on15
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
- Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional NetworksMing Chen, Zhewei Wei, Zengfeng Huang, Bolin Ding et al.ICML 2020 · 1,910 citations
- How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?Shaked Brody, Uri Alon, Eran YahavICLR 2022 · 1,717 citations
- DeepGCNs: Can GCNs Go As Deep As CNNs?Guohao Li, Matthias Müller, Ali K. Thabet, Bernard GhanemICCV 2019 · 1,586 citations
- Beyond Homophily in Graph Neural Networks: Current Limitations and Effective DesignsJiong Zhu, Yujun Yan, Lingxiao Zhao, Mark Heimann et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,490 citations
Related papers
- Towards an Optimal Asymmetric Graph Structure for Robust Semi-supervised Node ClassificationZixing Song, Yifei Zhang, Irwin KingKDD 2022 · 30 citations
- Simplified Graph Convolution with HeterophilySudhanshu Chanpuriya, Cameron MuscoNeurIPS 2022 · 42 citations
- NRGNN: Learning a Label Noise Resistant Graph Neural Network on Sparsely and Noisily Labeled GraphsEnyan Dai, Charu Aggarwal, Suhang WangKDD 2021 · 80 citations
- Multi-teacher Self-training for Semi-supervised Node Classification with Noisy LabelsYujing Liu, Zongqian Wu, Zhengyu Lu, Guoqiu Wen et al.ACM MM 2023 · 9 citations
- Is Homophily a Necessity for Graph Neural Networks?Yao Ma, Xiaorui Liu, Neil Shah, Jiliang TangICLR 2022 · 295 citations
