Simplified Graph Convolution with Heterophily
Sudhanshu Chanpuriya, Cameron Musco
Abstract
Recent work has shown that a simple, fast method called Simple Graph Convolution (SGC) (Wu et al., 2019) , which eschews deep learning, is competitive with deep methods like graph convolutional networks (GCNs) (Kipf & Welling, 2017) in common graph machine learning benchmarks. The use of graph data in SGC implicitly assumes the common but not universal graph characteristic of homophily, wherein nodes link to nodes which are similar. Here we confirm that SGC is indeed ineffective for heterophilous (i.e., non-homophilous) graphs via experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets. We propose Adaptive Simple Graph Convolution (ASGC), which we show can adapt to both homophilous and heterophilous graph structure. Like SGC, ASGC is not a deep model, and hence is fast, scalable, and interpretable; further, we can prove performance guarantees on natural synthetic data models. Empirically, ASGC is often competitive with recent deep models at node classification on a benchmark of real-world datasets. The SGC paper questioned whether the complexity of graph neural networks is warranted for common graph problems involving homophilous networks; our results similarly suggest that, while deep learning often achieves the highest performance, heterophilous structure alone does not necessitate these more involved methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b0ca4e9d-bff5-462b-8a12-025938b1ec00Cited by top-tier papers12
- How Universal Polynomial Bases Enhance Spectral Graph Neural Networks: Heterophily, Over-smoothing, and Over-squashingKeke Huang, Yu Guang Wang, Ming Li, Pietro LioICML 2024 · 62 citations
- Towards Deep Attention in Graph Neural Networks: Problems and RemediesSoo Yong Lee, Fanchen Bu, Jaemin Yoo, Kijung ShinICML 2023 · 44 citations
- Homophily-Related: Adaptive Hybrid Graph Filter for Multi-View Graph ClusteringZichen Wen, Yawen Ling, Yazhou Ren, Tianyi Wu et al.AAAI 2024 · 24 citations
- Graph Anomaly Detection with Bi-level OptimizationYuan Gao, Junfeng Fang, Yongduo Sui, Yangyang Li et al.WWW 2024 · 21 citations
- Optimizing Polynomial Graph Filters: A Novel Adaptive Krylov Subspace ApproachKeke Huang, Wencai Cao, Hoang Ta, Xiaokui Xiao et al.WWW 2024 · 9 citations
Builds on4
- Beyond Homophily in Graph Neural Networks: Current Limitations and Effective DesignsJiong Zhu, Yujun Yan, Lingxiao Zhao, Mark Heimann et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,490 citations
- Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional NetworksHongbin Pei, Bingzhe Wei, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang, Yu Lei et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,445 citations
- Adaptive Universal Generalized PageRank Graph Neural NetworkEli Chien, Jianhao Peng, Pan Li, Olgica MilenkovicICLR 2021 · 93 citations
- Breaking the Limit of Graph Neural Networks by Improving the Assortativity of Graphs with Local Mixing PatternsSusheel Suresh, Vinith Budde, Jennifer Neville, Pan Li et al.KDD 2021 · 76 citations
Related papers
- Is Homophily a Necessity for Graph Neural Networks?Yao Ma, Xiaorui Liu, Neil Shah, Jiliang TangICLR 2022 · 295 citations
- Powerful Graph Convolutional Networks with Adaptive Propagation Mechanism for Homophily and HeterophilyTao Wang, Di Jin, Rui Wang, Dongxiao He et al.AAAI 2022 · 126 citations
- AGS-GNN: Attribute-guided Sampling for Graph Neural NetworksSiddhartha Shankar Das, S. M. Ferdous, Mahantesh M. Halappanavar, Edoardo Serra et al.KDD 2024 · 3 citations
- Node Classification Beyond Homophily: Towards a General SolutionZhe Xu, Yuzhong Chen, Qinghai Zhou, Yuhang Wu et al.KDD 2023 · 17 citations
- A critical look at the evaluation of GNNs under heterophily: Are we really making progress?Oleg Platonov, Denis Kuznedelev, Michael Diskin, Artem Babenko et al.ICLR 2023 · 22 citations
