NetInfoF Framework: Measuring and Exploiting Network Usable Information
Meng-Chieh Lee, Haiyang Yu, Jian Zhang, Vassilis N. Ioannidis, Xiang Song, Soji Adeshina, Da Zheng, Christos Faloutsos
Abstract
Given a node-attributed graph, and a graph task (link prediction or node classification), can we tell if a graph neural network (GNN) will perform well? More specifically, do the graph structure and the node features carry enough usable information for the task? Our goals are (1) to develop a fast tool to measure how much information is in the graph structure and in the node features, and (2) to exploit the information to solve the task, if there is enough. We propose NET-INFOF, a framework including NETINFOF PROBE and NETINFOF ACT, for the measurement and the exploitation of network usable information (NUI), respectively. Given a graph data, NETINFOF PROBE measures NUI without any model training, and NETINFOF ACT solves link prediction and node classification, while two modules share the same backbone. In summary, NETINFOF has following notable advantages: (a) General, handling both link prediction and node classification; (b) Principled, with theoretical guarantee and closed-form solution; (c) Effective, thanks to the proposed adjustment to node similarity; (d) Scalable, scaling linearly with the input size. In our carefully designed synthetic datasets, NETINFOF correctly identifies the ground truth of NUI and is the only method being robust to all graph scenarios. Applied on real-world datasets, NETINFOF wins in 11 out of 12 times on link prediction compared to general GNN baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8ac91c52-b0ca-4e65-98db-0f55a582e53fCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on15
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
- Beyond Homophily in Graph Neural Networks: Current Limitations and Effective DesignsJiong Zhu, Yujun Yan, Lingxiao Zhao, Mark Heimann et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,490 citations
- Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional NetworksHongbin Pei, Bingzhe Wei, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang, Yu Lei et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,445 citations
- Large Scale Learning on Non-Homophilous Graphs: New Benchmarks and Strong Simple MethodsDerek Lim, Felix Hohne, Xiuyu Li, Sijia Linda Huang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 534 citations
- Simple Spectral Graph ConvolutionHao Zhu, Piotr KoniuszICLR 2021 · 352 citations
Related papers
- Neo-GNNs: Neighborhood Overlap-aware Graph Neural Networks for Link PredictionSeongjun Yun, Seoyoon Kim, Junhyun Lee, Jaewoo Kang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 183 citations
- Shapley-Guided Utility Learning for Effective Graph Inference Data ValuationHongliang Chi, Qiong Wu, Zhengyi Zhou, Yao MaICLR 2025
- AutoGEL: An Automated Graph Neural Network with Explicit Link InformationZhili Wang, Shimin Di, Lei ChenNeurIPS 2021 · 46 citations
- Bridging Theory and Practice in Link Representation with Graph Neural NetworksVeronica Lachi, Francesco Ferrini, Antonio Longa, Bruno Lepri et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- Characterizing Graph Datasets for Node Classification: Homophily-Heterophily Dichotomy and BeyondOleg Platonov, Denis Kuznedelev, Artem Babenko, Liudmila ProkhorenkovaNeurIPS 2023 · 95 citations
