Factorized Neural Processes for Neural Processes: K-Shot Prediction of Neural Responses
R. James Cotton, Fabian H. Sinz, Andreas S. Tolias
Abstract
In recent years, artificial neural networks have achieved state-of-the-art performance for predicting the responses of neurons in the visual cortex to natural stimuli. However, they require a time consuming parameter optimization process for accurately modeling the tuning function of newly observed neurons, which prohibits many applications including real-time, closed-loop experiments. We overcome this limitation by formulating the problem as -shot prediction to directly infer a neuron's tuning function from a small set of stimulus-response pairs using a Neural Process. This required us to developed a Factorized Neural Process, which embeds the observed set into a latent space partitioned into the receptive field location and the tuning function properties. We show on simulated responses that the predictions and reconstructed receptive fields from the Factorized Neural Process approach ground truth with increasing number of trials. Critically, the latent representation that summarizes the tuning function of a neuron is inferred in a quick, single forward pass through the network. Finally, we validate this approach on real neural data from visual cortex and find that the predictive accuracy is comparable to -- and for small even greater than -- optimization based approaches, while being substantially faster. We believe this novel deep learning systems identification framework will facilitate better real-time integration of artificial neural network modeling into neuroscience experiments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 856049c7-b31c-42da-8a8f-d5324b0ee699Cited by top-tier papers6
- Reproducibility of predictive networks for mouse visual cortexPolina Turishcheva, Max F. Burg, Fabian H. Sinz, Alexander S. EckerNeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
- Understanding Neural Coding on Latent Manifolds by Sharing Features and Dividing EnsemblesMartin Bjerke, Lukas Schott, Kristopher T. Jensen, Claudia Battistin et al.ICLR 2023 · 5 citations
- Self-Attention-Based Contextual Modulation Improves Neural System IdentificationIsaac Lin, Tianye Wang, Shang Gao, Shiming Tang et al.ICLR 2025
- AVM: Towards Structure-Preserving Neural Response Modeling in the Visual Cortex Across Stimuli and IndividualsQi Xu, Shuai Gong, Xuming Ran, Haihua Luo et al.AAAI 2026
- Revisiting Neural Processes via Fourier Transform and Volterra SeriesPeiman Mohseni, Nick Duffield, Raymond K WongICML 2026
Builds on1
Related papers
- Most discriminative stimuli for functional cell type clusteringMax F. Burg, Thomas Zenkel, Michaela Vystrcilová, Jonathan Oesterle et al.ICLR 2024 · 6 citations
- Natural image synthesis for the retina with variational information bottleneck representationBabak Rahmani, Demetri Psaltis, Christophe MoserNeurIPS 2022 · 3 citations
- A flow-based latent state generative model of neural population responses to natural imagesMohammad Bashiri, Edgar Y. Walker, Konstantin-Klemens Lurz, Akshay Kumar Jagadish et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 31 citations
- Nonlinear dynamics of localization in neural receptive fieldsLeon Lufkin, Andrew M. Saxe, Erin GrantNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
- A tale of two tails: Preferred and anti-preferred natural stimuli in visual cortexRabia Gondur, Patricia L. Stan, Matthew A. Smith, Benjamin R. CowleyICLR 2026 · 3 citations
