A tale of two tails: Preferred and anti-preferred natural stimuli in visual cortex
Rabia Gondur, Patricia L. Stan, Matthew A. Smith, Benjamin R. Cowley
Abstract
An ongoing quest in neuroscience is to find the preferred stimulus of a sensory neuron. This search lays the foundation for understanding how selectivity emerges in the primate visual stream---from simple edge-detecting neurons to highly-selective face neurons---as well as for the architectures and activation functions of deep neural networks. The prevailing notion is that a visual neuron primarily responds to a single preferred visual feature, like an oriented edge or the shape of an object, resulting in a 'one-tailed' distribution of responses to natural images. However, surprisingly, we instead find 'two-tailed' response distributions of primate visual cortical neurons, suggesting that these neurons have both preferred and anti-preferred stimuli. We experimentally validated anti-preferred stimuli by recording responses from macaque V4 to model-optimized stimuli. We find that these anti-preferred stimuli are important for describing a neuron's tuning, as both preferred and anti-preferred images are needed to predict a neuron's responses to natural images. Moreover, in a psychophysics task, humans rely on anti-preferred images to interpret and predict V4 stimulus tuning; this was not the case for internal units from a deep neural network. Interestingly, we find no discernible differences in image statistics between preferred and anti-preferred images. This suggests that by encoding anti-preferred features, a V4 population seemingly doubles its capacity for feature selectivity, allowing for a more flexible downstream readout. Overall, we establish anti-preferred stimuli as an important encoding property of V4 neurons. Our work embarks on a new quest in neuroscience to search for anti-preferred stimuli along the visual stream and offers a new perspective on how feature selectivity arises in the visual cortex and deep neural networks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0dae0b55-d528-44d3-89db-fd7d67ee22d3Builds on11
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in TrainingMansheej Paul, Surya Ganguli, Gintare Karolina DziugaiteNeurIPS 2021 · 806 citations
- Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningBen Sorscher, Robert Geirhos, Shashank Shekhar, Surya Ganguli et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 720 citations
- Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine visionRobert Geirhos, Kantharaju Narayanappa, Benjamin Mitzkus, Tizian Thieringer et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 304 citations
- DiffusionDB: A Large-scale Prompt Gallery Dataset for Text-to-Image Generative ModelsZijie J. Wang, Evan Montoya, David Munechika, Haoyang Yang et al.ACL 2023 · 149 citations
Related papers
- Most discriminative stimuli for functional cell type clusteringMax F. Burg, Thomas Zenkel, Michaela Vystrcilová, Jonathan Oesterle et al.ICLR 2024 · 6 citations
- Parallel Backpropagation for Shared-Feature VisualizationAlexander Lappe, Anna Bognár, Ghazaleh Ghamkhari Nejad, Albert Mukovskiy et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
- Feature segregation by signed weights in artificial vision systems and biological modelsGiordano Ramos-Traslosheros, Carlos PonceICLR 2026
- Characterizing the Ventral Visual Stream with Response-Optimized Neural Encoding ModelsMeenakshi Khosla, Keith Jamison, Amy Kuceyeski, Mert R. SabuncuNeurIPS 2022 · 16 citations
- Factorized Neural Processes for Neural Processes: K-Shot Prediction of Neural ResponsesR. James Cotton, Fabian H. Sinz, Andreas S. ToliasNeurIPS 2020 · 11 citations
