Reproducibility of predictive networks for mouse visual cortex
Polina Turishcheva, Max F. Burg, Fabian H. Sinz, Alexander S. Ecker
Abstract
Deep predictive models of neuronal activity have recently enabled several new discoveries about the selectivity and invariance of neurons in the visual cortex. These models learn a shared set of nonlinear basis functions, which are linearly combined via a learned weight vector to represent a neuron's function. Such weight vectors, which can be thought as embeddings of neuronal function, have been proposed to define functional cell types via unsupervised clustering. However, as deep models are usually highly overparameterized, the learning problem is unlikely to have a unique solution, which raises the question if such embeddings can be used in a meaningful way for downstream analysis. In this paper, we investigate how stable neuronal embeddings are with respect to changes in model architecture and initialization. We find that regularization to be an important ingredient for structured embeddings and develop an adaptive regularization that adjusts the strength of regularization per neuron. This regularization improves both predictive performance and how consistently neuronal embeddings cluster across model fits compared to uniform regularization. To overcome overparametrization, we propose an iterative feature pruning strategy which reduces the dimensionality of performance-optimized models by half without loss of performance and improves the consistency of neuronal embeddings with respect to clustering neurons. This result suggests that to achieve an objective taxonomy of cell types or a compact representation of the functional landscape, we need novel architectures or learning techniques that improve identifiability. We will make our code available at publication time.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Modeling Dynamic Neural Activity by combining Naturalistic Video Stimuli and Stimulus-independent Latent FactorsFinn Schmidt, Polina Turishcheva, Suhas Shrinivasan, Fabian H. SinzNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Learning to cluster neuronal functionNina Nellen, Polina Turishcheva, Michaela Vystrcilová, Shashwat Sridhar et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on6
- A Mean Field Analysis Of Deep ResNet And Beyond: Towards Provably Optimization Via Overparameterization From DepthYiping Lu, Chao Ma, Yulong Lu, Jianfeng Lu et al.ICML 2020 · 85 citations
- Generalization in data-driven models of primary visual cortexKonstantin-Klemens Lurz, Mohammad Bashiri, Konstantin Willeke, Akshay Kumar Jagadish et al.ICLR 2021 · 71 citations
- Energy Guided Diffusion for Generating Neurally Exciting ImagesPawel A. Pierzchlewicz, Konstantin Willeke, Arne Nix, Pavithra Elumalai et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 29 citations
- Rotation-invariant clustering of neuronal responses in primary visual cortexIvan Ustyuzhaninov, Santiago A. Cadena, Emmanouil Froudarakis, Paul G. Fahey et al.ICLR 2020 · 14 citations
- Factorized Neural Processes for Neural Processes: K-Shot Prediction of Neural ResponsesR. James Cotton, Fabian H. Sinz, Andreas S. ToliasNeurIPS 2020 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Measuring Model Complexity of Neural Networks with Curve Activation FunctionsXia Hu, Weiqing Liu, Jiang Bian, Jian PeiKDD 2020 · 25 citations
- Frivolous Units: Wider Networks Are Not Really That WideStephen Casper, Xavier Boix, Vanessa D'Amario, Ling Guo et al.AAAI 2021 · 20 citations
- Intraclass clustering: an implicit learning ability that regularizes DNNsSimon Carbonnelle, Christophe De VleeschouwerICLR 2021 · 2 citations
- Neuron-level Structured Pruning using Polarization RegularizerTao Zhuang, Zhixuan Zhang, Yuheng Huang, Xiaoyi Zeng et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 168 citations
- What Makes a Good Prune? Maximal Unstructured Pruning for Maximal Cosine SimilarityGabryel Mason-Williams, Fredrik DahlqvistICLR 2024 · 20 citations
