Code is the (F)Law: Demystifying and Mitigating Blockchain Inconsistency Attacks Caused by Software Bugs
Guorui Yu, Shibin Zhao, Chao Zhang, Zhiniang Peng, Yuandong Ni, Xinhui Han
Abstract
Blockchains promise to provide a tamper-proof medium for transactions, and thus enable many applications including cryptocurrency. As a system built on consensus, the correctness of a blockchain heavily relies on the consistency of states between its nodes. But consensus protocols of blockchains only guarantee the consistency in the transaction sequence rather than nodes' internal states. Instead, nodes must replay and exe-cute all transactions to maintain their local states independently. When executing transactions, any different execution result could cause a node out-of-sync and thus gets isolated from other nodes.After systematically modeling the transaction execution process in blockchains, we present a new attack INCITE, which can lead different nodes to different states. Specifically, attackers could invoke an ambiguous transaction of a vulnerable smart contract, utilize software bugs in smart contracts to lead nodes that execute this transaction into different states. Unlike attacks that bring short-term inconsistencies, such as fork attacks, INCITE can cause nodes in the blockchain to fall into a long-term inconsistent state, which further leads to great damages to the chain (e.g., double-spending attacks and expelling mining power). We have discovered 7 0day vulnerabilities in 5 popular blockchains which can enable this attack. We also proposed a defense solution to mitigate this threat. Experiments showed that it is effective and lightweight.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on3
- Securify: Practical Security Analysis of Smart ContractsPetar Tsankov, Andrei Marian Dan, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Arthur Gervais et al.CCS 2018 · 1,108 citations
- Hijacking Bitcoin: Routing Attacks on CryptocurrenciesMaria Apostolaki, Aviv Zohar, Laurent VanbeverS&P 2017 · 473 citations
- Sereum: Protecting Existing Smart Contracts Against Re-Entrancy AttacksMichael Rodler, Wenting Li, Ghassan O. Karame, Lucas DaviNDSS 2019 · 298 citations
Related papers
- LOKI: State-Aware Fuzzing Framework for the Implementation of Blockchain Consensus ProtocolsFuchen Ma, Yuanliang Chen, Meng Ren, Yuanhang Zhou et al.NDSS 2023
- Fork State-Aware Differential Fuzzing for Blockchain Consensus ImplementationsWonhoi Kim, Hocheol Nam, Muoi Tran, Amin Jalilov et al.ICSE 2025 · 1 citation
- Tyr: Finding Consensus Failure Bugs in Blockchain System with Behaviour Divergent ModelYuanliang Chen, Fuchen Ma, Yuanhang Zhou, Yu Jiang et al.S&P 2023
- Nurgle: Exacerbating Resource Consumption in Blockchain State Storage via MPT ManipulationZheyuan He, Zihao Li, Ao Qiao, Xiapu Luo et al.S&P 2024 · 21 citations
- BDoS: Blockchain Denial-of-ServiceMichael Mirkin, Yan Ji, Jonathan Pang, Ariah Klages-Mundt et al.CCS 2020 · 1 citation
