Improving Complex Reasoning with Dynamic Prompt Corruption: A Soft Prompt Optimization Approach
Sinan Fan, Liang Xie, Chen Shen, Ge Teng, Xiaosong Yuan, Xiaofeng Zhang, Chenxi Huang, Wenxiao Wang, Xiaofei He, Jieping Ye
Abstract
Prompt-tuning (PT) for large language models (LLMs) can facilitate the performance on various conventional NLP tasks with significantly fewer trainable parameters. However, our investigation reveals that PT provides limited improvement and may even degrade the primitive performance of LLMs on complex reasoning tasks. Such a phenomenon suggests that soft prompts can positively impact certain instances while negatively affecting others, particularly during the later phases of reasoning. To address these challenges, We first identify an information accumulation within the soft prompts. Through detailed analysis, we demonstrate that this phenomenon is often accompanied by erroneous information flow patterns in the deeper layers of the model, which ultimately lead to incorrect reasoning outcomes. we propose a novel method called Dynamic Prompt Corruption (DPC) to take better advantage of soft prompts in complex reasoning tasks, which dynamically adjusts the influence of soft prompts based on their impact on the reasoning process. Specifically, DPC consists of two stages: Dynamic Trigger and Dynamic Corruption. First, Dynamic Trigger measures the impact of soft prompts, identifying whether beneficial or detrimental. Then, Dynamic Corruption mitigates the negative effects of soft prompts by selectively masking key tokens that interfere with the reasoning process. We validate the proposed approach through extensive experiments on various LLMs and reasoning tasks, including GSM8K, MATH, and AQuA. Experimental results demonstrate that DPC can consistently enhance the performance of PT, achieving 4%-8% accuracy gains compared to vanilla prompt tuning, highlighting the effectiveness of our approach and its potential to enhance complex reasoning in LLMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- Linking Process to Outcome: Conditional Reward Modeling for LLM ReasoningZheng Zhang, Ziwei Shan, Kaitao Song, Yexin Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 16 citations
- Not All Tokens and Heads Are Equally Important: Dual-Level Attention Intervention for Hallucination MitigationLexiang Tang, Xianwei Zhuang, Bang Yang, Zhiyuan Hu et al.AAAI 2026 · 8 citations
- Multimodal Policy Internalization for Conversational AgentsZhenhailong Wang, Jiateng Liu, Amin Fazel, Ritesh Sarkhel et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Reasoning Fails Where Step Flow BreaksXiaoyu Xu, Yulan Pan, Xiaosong Yuan, Zhihong Shen et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- GeoCAD: Local Geometry-Controllable CAD Generation with Large Language ModelsZhanwei Zhang, Kaiyuan Liu, Junjie Liu, Wenxiao Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on18
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention SinksGuangxuan Xiao, Yuandong Tian, Beidi Chen, Song Han et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,714 citations
- The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt TuningBrian Lester, Rami Al-Rfou, Noah ConstantEMNLP 2021 · 94 citations
- On the Role of Attention in Prompt-tuningSamet Oymak, Ankit Singh Rawat, Mahdi Soltanolkotabi, Christos ThrampoulidisICML 2023 · 67 citations
Related papers
- DyVal: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reasoning TasksKaijie Zhu, Jiaao Chen, Jindong Wang, Neil Zhenqiang Gong et al.ICLR 2024 · 92 citations
- ADePT: Adaptive Decomposed Prompt Tuning for Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuningPengwei Tang, Xiaolin Hu, Yong LiuICLR 2025
- PAFT: Prompt-Agnostic Fine-TuningChenxing Wei, Mingwen Ou, Ying He, Yao Shu et al.EMNLP 2025
- Complexity-Based Prompting for Multi-step ReasoningYao Fu, Hao Peng, Ashish Sabharwal, Peter Clark et al.ICLR 2023 · 73 citations
- EPT: Efficient Prompt Tuning by Multi-Space Projection and Prompt FusionPengxiang Lan, Enneng Yang, Yuting Liu, Guibing Guo et al.AAAI 2025 · 4 citations
