On the Role of Attention in Prompt-tuning
Samet Oymak, Ankit Singh Rawat, Mahdi Soltanolkotabi, Christos Thrampoulidis
Abstract
Prompt-tuning is an emerging strategy to adapt large language models (LLM) to downstream tasks by learning a (soft-)prompt parameter from data. Despite its success in LLMs, there is limited theoretical understanding of the power of prompt-tuning and the role of the attention mechanism in prompting. In this work, we explore prompt-tuning for one-layer attention architectures and study contextual mixture-models where each input token belongs to a context-relevant or -irrelevant set. We isolate the role of prompttuning through a self-contained prompt-attention model. Our contributions are as follows: (1) We show that softmax-prompt-attention is provably more expressive than softmax-self-attention and linear-prompt-attention under our contextual data model. ( 2 ) We analyze the initial trajectory of gradient descent and show that it learns the prompt and prediction head with near-optimal sample complexity and demonstrate how the prompt can provably attend to sparse context-relevant tokens. (3) Assuming a known prompt but an unknown prediction head, we characterize the exact finite sample performance of prompt-attention which reveals the fundamental performance limits and the precise benefit of the context information. We also provide experiments that verify our theoretical insights on real datasets and demonstrate how prompt-tuning enables the model to attend to context-relevant information.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5865cfef-7b94-4e7a-b6a3-0dd948f200fcCited by top-tier papers42
- Scan and Snap: Understanding Training Dynamics and Token Composition in 1-layer TransformerYuandong Tian, Yiping Wang, Beidi Chen, Simon S. DuNeurIPS 2023 · 125 citations
- The Expressive Power of Low-Rank AdaptationYuchen Zeng, Kangwook LeeICLR 2024 · 116 citations
- Linear attention is (maybe) all you need (to understand Transformer optimization)Kwangjun Ahn, Xiang Cheng, Minhak Song, Chulhee Yun et al.ICLR 2024 · 92 citations
- Max-Margin Token Selection in Attention MechanismDavoud Ataee Tarzanagh, Yingcong Li, Xuechen Zhang, Samet OymakNeurIPS 2023 · 67 citations
- JoMA: Demystifying Multilayer Transformers via Joint Dynamics of MLP and AttentionYuandong Tian, Yiping Wang, Zhenyu Zhang, Beidi Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 49 citations
Builds on12
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Efficient large-scale language model training on GPU clusters using megatron-LMDeepak Narayanan, Mohammad Shoeybi, Jared Casper, Patrick LeGresley et al.SC 2021 · 576 citations
- Attention is not all you need: pure attention loses rank doubly exponentially with depthYihe Dong, Jean-Baptiste Cordonnier, Andreas LoukasICML 2021 · 522 citations
- Inductive Biases and Variable Creation in Self-Attention MechanismsBenjamin L. Edelman, Surbhi Goel, Sham M. Kakade, Cyril ZhangICML 2022 · 154 citations
Related papers
- APrompt: Attention Prompt Tuning for Efficient Adaptation of Pre-trained Language ModelsQifan Wang, Yuning Mao, Jingang Wang, Hanchao Yu et al.EMNLP 2023 · 25 citations
- PPT: Pre-trained Prompt Tuning for Few-shot LearningYuxian Gu, Xu Han, Zhiyuan Liu, Minlie HuangACL 2022
- Two-stage LLM Fine-tuning with Less Specialization and More GeneralizationYihan Wang, Si Si, Daliang Li, Michal Lukasik et al.ICLR 2024 · 45 citations
- ADePT: Adaptive Decomposed Prompt Tuning for Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuningPengwei Tang, Xiaolin Hu, Yong LiuICLR 2025
- IAPT: Instance-Aware Prompt Tuning for Large Language ModelsWei Zhu, Aaron Xuxiang Tian, Congrui Yin, Yuan Ni et al.ACL 2024 · 2 citations
