JoMA: Demystifying Multilayer Transformers via Joint Dynamics of MLP and Attention
Yuandong Tian, Yiping Wang, Zhenyu Zhang, Beidi Chen, Simon Shaolei Du
Abstract
We propose Joint MLP/Attention (JoMA) dynamics, a novel mathematical framework to understand the training procedure of multilayer Transformer architectures. This is achieved by integrating out the self-attention layer in Transformers, producing a modified dynamics of MLP layers only. JoMA removes unrealistic assumptions in previous analysis (e.g., lack of residual connection) and predicts that the attention first becomes sparse (to learn salient tokens), then dense (to learn less salient tokens) in the presence of nonlinear activations, while in the linear case, it is consistent with existing works that show attention becomes sparse over time. We leverage JoMA to qualitatively explains how tokens are combined to form hierarchies in multilayer Transformers, when the input tokens are generated by a latent hierarchical generative model. Experiments on models trained from real-world dataset (Wikitext2/Wikitext103) and various pre-trained models (OPT, Pythia) verify our theoretical findings. Code can be found in https://github.com/facebookresearch/luckmatters/tree/yuandong3.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers34
- How Transformers Learn Causal Structure with Gradient DescentEshaan Nichani, Alex Damian, Jason D. LeeICML 2024 · 117 citations
- Unveiling Induction Heads: Provable Training Dynamics and Feature Learning in TransformersSiyu Chen, Heejune Sheen, Tianhao Wang, Zhuoran YangNeurIPS 2024 · 48 citations
- Transformers Learn Nonlinear Features In Context: Nonconvex Mean-field Dynamics on the Attention LandscapeJuno Kim, Taiji SuzukiICML 2024 · 42 citations
- Linear Transformers are Versatile In-Context LearnersMax Vladymyrov, Johannes von Oswald, Mark Sandler, Rong GeNeurIPS 2024 · 37 citations
- Towards a Theoretical Understanding of the 'Reversal Curse' via Training DynamicsHanlin Zhu, Baihe Huang, Shaolun Zhang, Michael I. Jordan et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 37 citations
Builds on24
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley et al.ICML 2023 · 1,822 citations
- What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function ClassesShivam Garg, Dimitris Tsipras, Percy Liang, Gregory ValiantNeurIPS 2022 · 883 citations
- Transformers Learn In-Context by Gradient DescentJohannes von Oswald, Eyvind Niklasson, Ettore Randazzo, João Sacramento et al.ICML 2023 · 729 citations
- Are Transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions?Chulhee Yun, Srinadh Bhojanapalli, Ankit Singh Rawat, Sashank J. Reddi et al.ICLR 2020 · 481 citations
Related papers
- Training Dynamics of Transformers to Recognize Word Co-occurrence via Gradient Flow AnalysisHongru Yang, Bhavya Kailkhura, Zhangyang Wang, Yingbin LiangNeurIPS 2024 · 14 citations
- The emergence of sparse attention: impact of data distribution and benefits of repetitionNicolas Zucchet, Francesco D'Angelo, Andrew Kyle Lampinen, Stephanie ChanNeurIPS 2025 · 28 citations
- Focus and Dilution: The Multi-stage Learning Process of AttentionZheng-An Chen, Pengxiao Lin, Zhi-Qin John Xu, Tao LuoICML 2026
- Incremental Learning of Sparse Attention Patterns in TransformersOğuz YükselICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Attention Sinks and Compression Valleys in LLMs are Two Sides of the Same CoinEnrique Queipo-de-Llano, Alvaro Arroyo, Federico Barbero, Xiaowen Dong et al.ICLR 2026 · 56 citations
