The Knowledge Microscope: Features as Better Analytical Lenses than Neurons
Yuheng Chen, Pengfei Cao, Kang Liu, Jun Zhao
Abstract
Previous studies primarily utilize MLP neurons as units of analysis for understanding the mechanisms of factual knowledge in Language Models (LMs); however, neurons suffer from polysemanticity, leading to limited knowledge expression and poor interpretability. In this paper, we first conduct preliminary experiments to validate that Sparse Autoencoders (SAE) can effectively decompose neurons into features, which serve as alternative analytical units. With this established, our core findings reveal three key advantages of features over neurons: (1) Features exhibit stronger influence on knowledge expression and superior interpretability. ( 2 ) Features demonstrate enhanced monosemanticity, showing distinct activation patterns between related and unrelated facts. (3) Features achieve better privacy protection than neurons, demonstrated through our proposed FeatureErase method, which significantly outperforms existing neuron-based approaches in erasing privacy-sensitive information from LMs. 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Precise In-Parameter Concept Erasure in Large Language ModelsYoav Gur-Arieh, Clara Suslik, Yihuai Hong, Fazl Barez et al.EMNLP 2025 · 10 citations
- Towards Atoms of Large Language ModelsChenhui Hu, Pengfei Cao, Yubo Chen, Kang Liu et al.ICML 2026
Builds on6
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- Does Localization Inform Editing? Surprising Differences in Causality-Based Localization vs. Knowledge Editing in Language ModelsPeter Hase, Mohit Bansal, Been Kim, Asma GhandehariounNeurIPS 2023 · 307 citations
- Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value MemoriesMor Geva, Roei Schuster, Jonathan Berant, Omer LevyEMNLP 2021 · 33 citations
- Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencodersLeo Gao, Tom Dupré la Tour, Henk Tillman, Gabriel Goh et al.ICLR 2025 · 10 citations
- Knowledge Neurons in Pretrained TransformersDamai Dai, Li Dong, Yaru Hao, Zhifang Sui et al.ACL 2022
Related papers
- Rethinking Evaluation of Sparse Autoencoders through the Representation of Polysemous WordsGouki Minegishi, Hiroki Furuta, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka MatsuoICLR 2025
- Transformer Key-Value Memories Are Nearly as Interpretable as Sparse AutoencodersMengyu Ye, Jun Suzuki, Tatsuro Inaba, Tatsuki KuribayashiNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted RemedyJingyi Cui, Qi Zhang, Yifei Wang, Yisen WangICLR 2026 · 16 citations
- Revising and Falsifying Sparse Autoencoder Feature ExplanationsGeorge Ma, Samuel Pfrommer, Somayeh SojoudiNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Do Not Find Canonical Units of AnalysisPatrick Leask, Bart Bussmann, Michael T. Pearce, Joseph Isaac Bloom et al.ICLR 2025
