Cross-Lingual Text-Rich Visual Comprehension: An Information Theory Perspective
Xinmiao Yu, Xiaocheng Feng, Yun Li, Minghui Liao, Ya-Qi Yu, Xiachong Feng, Weihong Zhong, Ruihan Chen, Mengkang Hu, Jihao Wu, Duyu Tang, Dandan Tu, Bing Qin
Abstract
Recent Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have shown promising reasoning capabilities on text-rich images from charts, tables, and documents. However, the abundant text within such images may increase the model's sensitivity to language. This raises the need to evaluate LVLM performance on cross-lingual text-rich visual inputs, where the language in the image differs from the language of the instructions. To address this, we introduce XT-VQA (Cross-Lingual Text-Rich Visual Question Answering), a benchmark designed to assess how LVLMs handle language inconsistency between image text and questions. XT-VQA integrates five existing text-rich VQA datasets and a newly collected dataset, XPaperQA, covering diverse scenarios that require faithful recognition and comprehension of visual information despite language inconsistency. Our evaluation of prominent LVLMs on XT-VQA reveals a significant drop in performance for cross-lingual scenarios, even for models with multilingual capabilities. A mutual information analysis suggests that this performance gap stems from cross-lingual questions failing to adequately activate relevant visual information. To mitigate this issue, we propose MVCL-MI (Maximization of Vision-Language Cross-Lingual Mutual Information), where a visual-text cross-lingual alignment is built by maximizing mutual information between the model's outputs and visual information. This is achieved by distilling knowledge from monolingual to cross-lingual settings through KL divergence minimization, where monolingual output logits serve as a teacher. Experimental results on the XT-VQA demonstrate that MVCL-MI effectively reduces the visual-text cross-lingual performance disparity while preserving the inherent capabilities of LVLMs, shedding new light on the potential practice for improving LVLMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7f033e8f-5889-44db-9117-3ca065e97a2bBuilds on13
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction TuningWenliang Dai, Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Anthony Meng Huat Tiong et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,013 citations
- MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual ContextsPan Lu, Hritik Bansal, Tony Xia, Jiacheng Liu et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,472 citations
Related papers
- LRM-LLaVA: Overcoming the Modality Gap of Multilingual Large Language-Vision Model for Low-Resource LanguagesJunchen Li, Qing Yang, Bojian Jiang, Shaolin Zhu et al.AAAI 2025 · 3 citations
- TVQACML: Benchmarking Text-Centric Visual Question Answering in Multilingual Chinese Minority LanguagesJiu Sha, Yu Weng, Mengxiao Zhu, Chong Feng et al.EMNLP 2025
- POLYCHARTQA: Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models with Multilingual Chart Question AnsweringYichen Xu, Liangyu Chen, Liang Zhang, Zihao Yue et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- PRISM: A Benchmark for Unveiling Cross-modal Knowledge Inconsistency in Large Vision-Language ModelsMingjie Wei, Wei-Nan Zhang, Chen Zhang, Yifeng Ding et al.ACM MM 2025 · 1 citation
- CrossCheck-Bench: Diagnosing Compositional Failures in Multimodal Conflict ResolutionBaoliang Tian, Yuxuan Si, Jilong Wang, Lingyao Li et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
