From Future of Work to Future of Workers: Addressing Asymptomatic AI Harms to Foster Dignified Human-AI Interaction
Upol Ehsan, Samir Passi, Koustuv Saha, Todd McNutt, Mark O. Riedl, Sara Alcorn
Abstract
In the future of work discourse, AI is touted as the ultimate productivity amplifier. Yet, beneath the efficiency gains lie subtle erosions of human expertise and agency. This paper shifts focus from the future of work to the future of workers by navigating the AI-as-Amplifier Paradox: AI's dual role as enhancer and eroder, simultaneously strengthening performance while eroding underlying expertise. We present a year-long study on the longitudinal use of AI in a high-stakes workplace among cancer specialists. Initial operational gains hid "intuition rust": the gradual dulling of expert judgment. These asymptomatic effects evolved into chronic harms, such as skill atrophy and identity commoditization. Building on these findings, we offer a framework for dignified Human-AI interaction co-constructed with professional knowledge workers facing AI-induced skill erosion without traditional labor protections. The framework operationalizes sociotechnical immunity through dualpurpose mechanisms that serve institutional quality goals while building worker power to detect, contain, and recover from skill erosion, and preserve human identity. Evaluated across healthcare and software engineering, our work takes a foundational step toward dignified human-AI interaction futures by balancing productivity with the preservation of human expertise.
• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7e0b3942-3e92-479f-9b89-879c78e6ddacBuilds on16
- The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge WorkersHao-Ping (Hank) Lee, Advait Sarkar, Lev Tankelevitch, Ian Drosos et al.CHI 2025 · 690 citations
- Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systemsUpol Ehsan, Q. Vera Liao, Michael J. Muller, Mark O. Riedl et al.CHI 2021 · 505 citations
- A Case for Humans-in-the-Loop: Decisions in the Presence of Erroneous Algorithmic ScoresMaria De-Arteaga, Riccardo Fogliato, Alexandra ChouldechovaCHI 2020 · 176 citations
- Algorithmic Management Reimagined For Workers and By Workers: Centering Worker Well-Being in Gig WorkAngie Zhang, Alexander Boltz, Chun Wei Wang, Min Kyung LeeCHI 2022 · 166 citations
- Emotion AI at Work: Implications for Workplace Surveillance, Emotional Labor, and Emotional PrivacyKat Roemmich, Florian Schaub, Nazanin AndalibiCHI 2023 · 123 citations
Related papers
- Algorithmic Power or Punishment: Information Worker Perspectives on Passive Sensing Enabled AI Phenotyping of Performance and WellbeingVedant Das Swain, Lan Gao, William A. Wood, Srikruthi C. Matli et al.CHI 2023 · 42 citations
- Investigating Writing Professionals' Relationships with GenAI: How Combined Perceptions of Rivalry and Collaboration Shape Work Practices and OutcomesRama Adithya Varanasi, Oded Nov, Batia Mishan WiesenfeldCHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Investigating AI-induced Technostress and Coping Strategies of ProfessionalsHeesung Kwon, Jeesun Oh, Suyoun Lee, Sunok Lee et al.CHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Situated Imaginaries: Designing AI Futures with Computer Science Teaching AssistantsGrace Barkhuff, Ian Pruitt, Vyshnavi Namani, William Gregory Johnson et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- "Who is running it?" Towards Equitable AI Deployment in Home Care WorkIan René Solano-Kamaiko, Melissa Tan, Joy Ming, Ariel C. Avgar et al.CHI 2025 · 5 citations
