From Junior to Senior: Allocating Agency and Navigating Professional Growth in Agentic AI-Mediated Software Engineering
Dana Feng, Bhada Yun, April Yi Wang
Abstract
Juniors enter as AI‑natives, seniors adapted mid‑career. AI is not just changing how engineers code—it is reshaping who holds agency across work and professional growth. We contribute junior–senior accounts on their usage of agentic AI through a three-phase mixed-methods study: ACTA combined with a Delphi process with 5 seniors, an AI-assisted debugging task with 10 juniors, and blind reviews of junior prompt histories by 5 more seniors. We found that agency in software engineering is primarily constrained by organizational policies rather than individual preferences, with experienced developers maintaining control through detailed delegation while novices struggle between over-reliance and cautious avoidance. Seniors leverage pre-AI foundational instincts to steer modern tools and possess valuable perspectives for mentoring juniors in their early AI-encouraged career development. From synthesis of results, we suggest three practices that focus on preserving agency in software engineering for coding, learning, and mentorship, especially as AI grows increasingly autonomous.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f1bfc854-b6f0-4d37-9b53-ab4212c36b3cBuilds on19
- To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-makingZana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, Krzysztof Z. GajosCSCW 2021 · 962 citations
- The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge WorkersHao-Ping (Hank) Lee, Advait Sarkar, Lev Tankelevitch, Ian Drosos et al.CHI 2025 · 690 citations
- Grounded Copilot: How Programmers Interact with Code-Generating ModelsShraddha Barke, Michael B. James, Nadia PolikarpovaOOPSLA 2023 · 408 citations
- Using an LLM to Help With Code UnderstandingDaye Nam, Andrew Macvean, Vincent J. Hellendoorn, Bogdan Vasilescu et al.ICSE 2024 · 264 citations
- Fostering Appropriate Reliance on Large Language Models: The Role of Explanations, Sources, and InconsistenciesSunnie S. Y. Kim, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Q. Vera Liao, Tania Lombrozo et al.CHI 2025 · 118 citations
Related papers
- Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer WorkflowsValerie Chen, Ameet Talwalkar, Robert Brennan, Graham NeubigCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- How Do Developers Interact with AI? An Exploratory Study on Modeling Developer Programming BehaviorYinan Wu, Ze Shi Li, Kathryn Thomasset Stolee, Bowen XuFSE 2026
- Evolving Enactions of Expertise: Software Engineers' Evaluation and Demonstration of Coding Expertise with AI Coding AssistantsYeonju Jang, Mose Sakashita, Koichiro Niinuma, Aakar GuptaCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Human-Human-AI Triadic Programming: Uncovering the Role of AI Agent and the Value of Human Partner in Collaborative LearningTaufiq Daryanto, Xiaohan Ding, Kaike Ping, Lance T. Wilhelm et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Evolving with AI: A Longitudinal Analysis of Developer LogsAgnia Sergeyuk, Eric Huang, Dariia Karaeva, Anastasiia Serova et al.ICSE 2026
