TRACE: A Corpus of Team Creative Discussions
Yixuan Jiang, Tiancheng Hu, José Hernández-Orallo, David Stillwell, Luning Sun
Abstract
Understanding how discussion dynamics shape team creativity has been limited by the difficulty of measuring process at scale. We introduce TRACE, a corpus of 309 group discussions from 103 teams (421 participants) across six creative problem-solving tasks. The dataset follows an input-process-output framework, integrating team composition (demographics, personalities), full discussion transcripts, and creativity outcomes. Using sentence embeddings and factor analysis, we identify four interpretable discussion dimensions: Coherence, Exploration, Convergence, and Participation. Analysis reveals a depth-breadth trade-off: coherent idea development inversely relates to semantic exploration. Larger teams explore more broadly but converge less effectively while team diversity shapes participation patterns more than discussion content. Novelty and usefulness in the creativity outcomes follow distinct pathways: Exploration and Convergence predict novelty, whereas Coherence predicts usefulness. These findings ground our understanding of how teams talk their way to creative solutions and provide guidance for designing multiagent systems. 1 * Work done while visiting the University of Cambridge.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7c36de0e-8d79-45b1-84e2-79d82a49e108Builds on3
- MeetingBank: A Benchmark Dataset for Meeting SummarizationYebowen Hu, Timothy Ganter, Hanieh Deilamsalehy, Franck Dernoncourt et al.ACL 2023 · 19 citations
- Creativity in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems: A SurveyYi-Cheng Lin, Kang-Chieh Chen, Zhe-Yan Li, Tzu-Heng Wu et al.EMNLP 2025 · 3 citations
- Fora: A corpus and framework for the study of facilitated dialogueHope Schroeder, Deb Roy, Jad KabbaraACL 2024
Related papers
- Towards AI as Colleagues: Multi-Agent System Improves Structured Ideation ProcessesKexin Quan, Dina Albassam, Mengke Wu, Zijian Ding et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- A Paradigm for Creative OwnershipTejaswi Polimetla, Katy Ilonka Gero, Elena L. GlassmanCHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Representational Similarity and Model Behavior in Multi-Agent InteractionYujin Potter, Seun Eisape, Shiyang Lai, Alexander Huth et al.ICML 2026
- Language Grounded Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning with Human-interpretable CommunicationHuao Li, Hossein Nourkhiz Mahjoub, Behdad Chalaki, Vaishnav Tadiparthi et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 31 citations
- Beyond Team Makeup: Diversity in Teams Predicts Valued Outcomes in Computer-Mediated CollaborationsAngela E. B. Stewart, Mary Jean Amon, Nicholas D. Duran, Sidney K. D'MelloCHI 2020 · 15 citations
