The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Object Recognition
Sharath Girish, Shishira R. Maiya, Kamal Gupta, Hao Chen, Larry S. Davis, Abhinav Shrivastava
Abstract
Recognition tasks, such as object recognition and keypoint estimation, have seen widespread adoption in recent years. Most state-of-the-art methods for these tasks use deep networks that are computationally expensive and have huge memory footprints. This makes it exceedingly difficult to deploy these systems on low power embedded devices. Hence, the importance of decreasing the storage requirements and the amount of computation in such models is paramount. The recently proposed Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (LTH) states that deep neural networks trained on large datasets contain smaller subnetworks that achieve on par performance as the dense networks. In this work, we perform the first empirical study investigating LTH for model pruning in the context of object detection, instance segmentation, and keypoint estimation. Our studies reveal that lottery tickets obtained from Imagenet pretraining do not transfer well to the downstream tasks. We provide guidance on how to find lottery tickets with up to 80% overall sparsity on different sub-tasks without incurring any drop in the performance. Finally, we analyse the behavior of trained tickets with respect to various task attributes such as object size, frequency, and difficulty of detection.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7c09fc66-ba6c-4664-8788-25237f6c337cCited by top-tier papers20
- PARP: Prune, Adjust and Re-Prune for Self-Supervised Speech RecognitionCheng-I Jeff Lai, Yang Zhang, Alexander H. Liu, Shiyu Chang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 91 citations
- Rare Gems: Finding Lottery Tickets at InitializationKartik Sreenivasan, Jy-yong Sohn, Liu Yang, Matthew Grinde et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 52 citations
- Dynamic Sparse Network for Time Series Classification: Learning What to "See"Qiao Xiao, Boqian Wu, Yu Zhang, Shiwei Liu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 45 citations
- A Random CNN Sees Objects: One Inductive Bias of CNN and Its ApplicationsYun-Hao Cao, Jianxin WuAAAI 2022 · 36 citations
- Drawing Robust Scratch Tickets: Subnetworks with Inborn Robustness Are Found within Randomly Initialized NetworksYonggan Fu, Qixuan Yu, Yang Zhang, Shang Wu et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 36 citations
Builds on9
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient FlowChaoqi Wang, Guodong Zhang, Roger B. GrosseICLR 2020 · 743 citations
- Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network PruningAlex Renda, Jonathan Frankle, Michael CarbinICLR 2020 · 437 citations
- The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Pre-trained BERT NetworksTianlong Chen, Jonathan Frankle, Shiyu Chang, Sijia Liu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 428 citations
- Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You NeedEran Malach, Gilad Yehudai, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Ohad ShamirICML 2020 · 327 citations
Related papers
- Plant 'n' Seek: Can You Find the Winning Ticket?Jonas Fischer, Rebekka BurkholzICLR 2022 · 21 citations
- Playing Lottery Tickets with Vision and LanguageZhe Gan, Yen-Chun Chen, Linjie Li, Tianlong Chen et al.AAAI 2022 · 64 citations
- Winning the Lottery with Continuous SparsificationPedro Savarese, Hugo Silva, Michael MaireNeurIPS 2020 · 162 citations
- Lottery Ticket Preserves Weight Correlation: Is It Desirable or Not?Ning Liu, Geng Yuan, Zhengping Che, Xuan Shen et al.ICML 2021 · 34 citations
- Finding Meta Winning Ticket to Train Your MAMLDawei Gao, Yuexiang Xie, Zimu Zhou, Zhen Wang et al.KDD 2022 · 2 citations
