How Effective Are They? Exploring Large Language Model Based Fuzz Driver Generation
Cen Zhang, Yaowen Zheng, Mingqiang Bai, Yeting Li, Wei Ma, Xiaofei Xie, Yuekang Li, Limin Sun, Yang Liu
Abstract
Fuzz drivers are essential for library API fuzzing. However, automatically generating fuzz drivers is a complex task, as it demands the creation of high-quality, correct, and robust API usage code. An LLM-based (Large Language Model) approach for generating fuzz drivers is a promising area of research. Unlike traditional program analysis-based generators, this text-based approach is more generalized and capable of harnessing a variety of API usage information, resulting in code that is friendly for human readers. However, there is still a lack of understanding regarding the fundamental issues on this direction, such as its effectiveness and potential challenges. To bridge this gap, we conducted the first in-depth study targeting the important issues of using LLMs to generate effective fuzz drivers. Our study features a curated dataset with 86 fuzz driver generation questions from 30 widely-used C projects. Six prompting strategies are designed and tested across five state-of-the-art LLMs with five different temperature settings. In total, our study evaluated 736,430 generated fuzz drivers, with 0.85 billion token costs ($8,000+ charged tokens). Additionally, we compared the LLM-generated drivers against those utilized in industry, conducting extensive fuzzing experiments (3.75 CPU-year). Our study uncovered that: 1) While LLM-based fuzz driver generation is a promising direction, it still encounters several obstacles towards practical applications; 2) LLMs face difficulties in generating effective fuzz drivers for APIs with intricate specifics. Three featured design choices of prompt strategies can be beneficial: issuing repeat queries, querying with examples, and employing an iterative querying process; 3) While LLM-generated drivers can yield fuzzing outcomes that are on par with those used in the industry, there are substantial opportunities for enhancement, such as extending contained API usage, or integrating semantic oracles to facilitate logical bug detection. Our insights have been implemented to improve the OSS-Fuzz-Gen project, facilitating practical fuzz driver generation in industry.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7a531a49-a2b2-4584-9085-a4ed5ee50793Cited by top-tier papers15
- SEC-bench: Automated Benchmarking of LLM Agents on Real-World Software Security TasksHwiwon Lee, Ziqi Zhang, Hanxiao Lu, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 86 citations
- Cottontail: Large Language Model-Driven Concolic Execution for Highly Structured Test Input GenerationHaoxin Tu, Seongmin Lee, Yuxian Li, Peng Chen et al.S&P 2026 · 22 citations
- deepSURF: Detecting Memory Safety Vulnerabilities in Rust Through Fuzzing LLM-Augmented HarnessesGeorgios C. Androutsopoulos, Antonio BianchiS&P 2026 · 5 citations
- Scaling Automated Database System TestingSuyang Zhong, Manuel RiggerASPLOS 2026 · 4 citations
- The Seeds of the Future Sprout from History: Fuzzing for Unveiling Vulnerabilities in Prospective Deep-Learning LibrariesZhiyuan Li, Jingzheng Wu, Xiang Ling, Tianyue Luo et al.ICSE 2025 · 4 citations
Builds on14
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 citations
- WizardCoder: Empowering Code Large Language Models with Evol-InstructZiyang Luo, Can Xu, Pu Zhao, Qingfeng Sun et al.ICLR 2024 · 945 citations
- Evaluating Fuzz TestingGeorge Klees, Andrew Ruef, Benji Cooper, Shiyi Wei et al.CCS 2018 · 753 citations
- Asleep at the Keyboard? Assessing the Security of GitHub Copilot's Code ContributionsHammond Pearce, Baleegh Ahmad, Benjamin Tan, Brendan Dolan-Gavitt et al.S&P 2022 · 725 citations
- Large Language Models Are Zero-Shot Fuzzers: Fuzzing Deep-Learning Libraries via Large Language ModelsYinlin Deng, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Haoran Peng, Chenyuan Yang et al.ISSTA 2023 · 253 citations
Related papers
- PromeFuzz: A Knowledge-Driven Approach to Fuzzing Harness Generation with Large Language ModelsYuwei Liu, Junquan Deng, Xiangkun Jia, Yanhao Wang et al.CCS 2025
- Your Fix Is My Exploit: Enabling Comprehensive DL Library API Fuzzing with Large Language ModelsKunpeng Zhang, Shuai Wang, Jitao Han, Xiaogang Zhu et al.ICSE 2025 · 6 citations
- Fuzz4All: Universal Fuzzing with Large Language ModelsChunqiu Steven Xia, Matteo Paltenghi, Jia Le Tian, Michael Pradel et al.ICSE 2024 · 155 citations
- ELFuzz: Efficient Input Generation via LLM-driven Synthesis Over Fuzzer SpaceChuyang Chen, Brendan Dolan-Gavitt, Zhiqiang LinUSENIX Security 2025
- Prompt Fuzzing for Fuzz Driver GenerationYunlong Lyu, Yuxuan Xie, Peng Chen, Hao ChenCCS 2024 · 21 citations
