Fuzz4All: Universal Fuzzing with Large Language Models
Chunqiu Steven Xia, Matteo Paltenghi, Jia Le Tian, Michael Pradel, Lingming Zhang
Abstract
Fuzzing has achieved tremendous success in discovering bugs and vulnerabilities in various software systems. Systems under test (SUTs) that take in programming or formal language as inputs, e.g., compilers, runtime engines, constraint solvers, and software libraries with accessible APIs, are especially important as they are fundamental building blocks of software development. However, existing fuzzers for such systems often target a specific language, and thus cannot be easily applied to other languages or even other versions of the same language. Moreover, the inputs generated by existing fuzzers are often limited to specific features of the input language, and thus can hardly reveal bugs related to other or new features. This paper presents Fuzz4All, the first fuzzer that is universal in the sense that it can target many different input languages and many different features of these languages. The key idea behind Fuzz4All is to leverage large language models (LLMs) as an input generation and mutation engine, which enables the approach to produce diverse and realistic inputs for any practically relevant language. To realize this potential, we present a novel autoprompting technique, which creates LLM prompts that are well-suited for fuzzing, and a novel LLM-powered fuzzing loop, which iteratively updates the prompt to create new fuzzing inputs. We evaluate Fuzz4All on nine systems under test that take in six different languages (C, C++, Go, SMT2, Java, and Python) as inputs. The evaluation shows, across all six languages, that universal fuzzing achieves higher coverage than existing, language-specific fuzzers. Furthermore, Fuzz4All has identified 98 bugs in widely used systems, such as GCC, Clang, Z3, CVC5, OpenJDK, and the Qiskit quantum computing platform, with 64 bugs already confirmed by developers as previously unknown.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 48cac10f-f7da-40e2-8d28-618edd00d08aCited by top-tier papers97
- Copiloting the Copilots: Fusing Large Language Models with Completion Engines for Automated Program RepairYuxiang Wei, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Lingming ZhangFSE 2023 · 111 citations
- Evaluating and Improving ChatGPT for Unit Test GenerationZhiqiang Yuan, Mingwei Liu, Shiji Ding, Kaixin Wang et al.FSE 2024 · 89 citations
- SEC-bench: Automated Benchmarking of LLM Agents on Real-World Software Security TasksHwiwon Lee, Ziqi Zhang, Hanxiao Lu, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 86 citations
- WhiteFox: White-Box Compiler Fuzzing Empowered by Large Language ModelsChenyuan Yang, Yinlin Deng, Runyu Lu, Jiayi Yao et al.OOPSLA 2024 · 74 citations
- How Beginning Programmers and Code LLMs (Mis)read Each OtherSydney Nguyen, Hannah McLean Babe, Yangtian Zi, Arjun Guha et al.CHI 2024 · 66 citations
Builds on30
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and GenerationYue Wang, Weishi Wang, Shafiq R. Joty, Steven C. H. HoiEMNLP 2021 · 1,224 citations
- Evaluating Fuzz TestingGeorge Klees, Andrew Ruef, Benji Cooper, Shiyi Wei et al.CCS 2018 · 753 citations
Related papers
- Once4All: Skeleton-Guided SMT Solver Fuzzing with LLM-Synthesized GeneratorsMaolin Sun, Yibiao Yang, Yuming ZhouASPLOS 2026 · 1 citation
- Low-Cost and Comprehensive Non-textual Input Fuzzing with LLM-Synthesized Input GeneratorsKunpeng Zhang, Zongjie Li, Daoyuan Wu, Shuai Wang et al.USENIX Security 2025
- ELFuzz: Efficient Input Generation via LLM-driven Synthesis Over Fuzzer SpaceChuyang Chen, Brendan Dolan-Gavitt, Zhiqiang LinUSENIX Security 2025
- Large Language Models Are Zero-Shot Fuzzers: Fuzzing Deep-Learning Libraries via Large Language ModelsYinlin Deng, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Haoran Peng, Chenyuan Yang et al.ISSTA 2023 · 253 citations
- Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of Large Language Models on Directed Test Input GenerationZongze Jiang, Ming Wen, Jialun Cao, Xuanhua Shi et al.ASE 2024 · 8 citations
