Scaling Automated Database System Testing
Suyang Zhong, Manuel Rigger
Abstract
Recently, various automated testing approaches have been proposed that use specialized test oracles to find hundreds of logic bugs in mature, widely-used Database Management Systems (DBMSs). These test oracles require database and query generators, which must account for the often significant differences between the SQL dialects of these systems. Since it can take weeks to implement such generators, many DBMS developers are unlikely to invest the time to adopt such automated testing approaches. In short, existing approaches fail to scale to the plethora of DBMSs. In this work, we present both a vision and a platform, SQLancer++, to apply test oracles to any SQL-based DBMS that supports a subset of common SQL features. Our technical core contribution is a novel architecture for an adaptive SQL statement generator. This adaptive SQL generator generates SQL statements with various features, some of which might not be supported by the given DBMS, and then learns through interaction with the DBMS, which of these are understood by the DBMS. Thus, over time, the generator will generate mostly valid SQL statements. We evaluated SQLancer++ across 18 DBMSs and discovered a total of 196 unique, previously unknown bugs, of which 180 were fixed after we reported them. While SQLancer++ is the first major step towards scaling automated DBMS testing, various follow-up challenges remain.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 20cd67dd-a43f-477e-bde0-a29131a2e724Cited by top-tier papers3
- Automated Discovery of Test Oracles for Database Management Systems Using LLMsQiuyang Mang, Runyuan He, Suyang Zhong, Xiaoxuan Liu et al.SIGMOD 2026 · 1 citation
- Detecting Data-Type-Related Logic Bugs in Relational DBMSs via Compatible Database ConstructionJiansen Song, Wensheng Dou, Yingying Zheng, Yu Gao et al.VLDB 2026
- Dialect-Agnostic SQL Parsing via LLM-Based SegmentationJunwen An, Kabilan Mahathevan, Manuel RiggerSIGMOD 2026
Builds on25
- Testing Database Engines via Pivoted Query SynthesisManuel Rigger, Zhendong SuOSDI 2020 · 150 citations
- Finding bugs in database systems via query partitioningManuel Rigger, Zhendong SuOOPSLA 2020 · 116 citations
- Detecting optimization bugs in database engines via non-optimizing reference engine constructionManuel Rigger, Zhendong SuFSE 2020 · 104 citations
- Learning a Partitioning Advisor for Cloud DatabasesBenjamin Hilprecht, Carsten Binnig, Uwe RöhmSIGMOD 2020 · 64 citations
- Griffin : Grammar-Free DBMS FuzzingJingzhou Fu, Jie Liang, Zhiyong Wu, Mingzhe Wang et al.ASE 2022 · 44 citations
Related papers
- Pinolo: Detecting Logical Bugs in Database Management Systems with Approximate Query SynthesisZongyin Hao, Quanfeng Huang, Chengpeng Wang, Jianfeng Wang et al.USENIX ATC 2023 · 26 citations
- Finding Logic Bugs in Spatial Database Engines via Affine Equivalent InputsWenjing Deng, Qiuyang Mang, Chengyu Zhang, Manuel RiggerSIGMOD 2025 · 3 citations
- Testing Database Engines via Query Plan GuidanceJinsheng Ba, Manuel RiggerICSE 2023 · 39 citations
- Mozi: Discovering DBMS Bugs via Configuration-Based Equivalent TransformationJie Liang, Zhiyong Wu, Jingzhou Fu, Mingzhe Wang et al.ICSE 2024 · 18 citations
- Detecting Logical Bugs of DBMS with Coverage-based GuidanceYu Liang, Song Liu, Hong HuUSENIX Security 2022
