Policy Aggregation
Parand A. Alamdari, Soroush Ebadian, Ariel D. Procaccia
Abstract
We consider the challenge of AI value alignment with multiple individuals that have different reward functions and optimal policies in an underlying Markov decision process. We formalize this problem as one of policy aggregation, where the goal is to identify a desirable collective policy. We argue that an approach informed by social choice theory is especially suitable. Our key insight is that social choice methods can be reinterpreted by identifying ordinal preferences with volumes of subsets of the state-action occupancy polytope. Building on this insight, we demonstrate that a variety of methods--including approval voting, Borda count, the proportional veto core, and quantile fairness--can be practically applied to policy aggregation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on10
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- A Minimaximalist Approach to Reinforcement Learning from Human FeedbackGokul Swamy, Christoph Dann, Rahul Kidambi, Steven Wu et al.ICML 2024 · 147 citations
- Reward is enough for convex MDPsTom Zahavy, Brendan O'Donoghue, Guillaume Desjardins, Satinder SinghNeurIPS 2021 · 96 citations
- Fair Federated Learning via the Proportional Veto CoreBhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Aniket Murhekar, Zhuowen Yuan, Bo Li et al.ICML 2024 · 14 citations
- Computing the Proportional Veto CoreEgor Ianovski, Aleksei Y. KondratevAAAI 2021 · 9 citations
Related papers
- Navigating the Social Welfare Frontier: Portfolios for Multi-objective Reinforcement LearningCheol Woo Kim, Jai Moondra, Shresth Verma, Madeleine Pollack et al.ICML 2025
- The Axiomatic Value of Regularization in AI Alignment from Human PreferencesEzgi KorkmazICML 2026
- Beyond RLHF and NLHF: Population-Proportional Alignment under an Axiomatic FrameworkKihyun Kim, Jiawei Zhang, Asuman Ozdaglar, Pablo A. ParriloICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- AI Alignment with Changing and Influenceable Reward FunctionsMicah Carroll, Davis Foote, Anand Siththaranjan, Stuart Russell et al.ICML 2024 · 44 citations
- Consistent Aggregation of Objectives with Diverse Time Preferences Requires Non-Markovian RewardsSilviu PitisNeurIPS 2023 · 13 citations
