A Minimaximalist Approach to Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Gokul Swamy, Christoph Dann, Rahul Kidambi, Steven Wu, Alekh Agarwal
Abstract
We present Self-Play Preference Optimization (SPO), an algorithm for reinforcement learning from human feedback. Our approach is minimalist in that it does not require training a reward model nor unstable adversarial training and is therefore rather simple to implement. Our approach is maximalist in that it provably handles non-Markovian, intransitive, and stochastic preferences while being robust to the compounding errors that plague offline approaches to sequential prediction. To achieve the preceding qualities, we build upon the concept of a Minimax Winner (MW), a notion of preference aggregation from the social choice theory literature that frames learning from preferences as a zero-sum game between two policies. By leveraging the symmetry of this game, we prove that rather than using the traditional technique of dueling two policies to compute the MW, we can simply have a single agent play against itself while maintaining strong convergence guarantees. Practically, this corresponds to sampling multiple trajectories from a policy, asking a preference or teacher model to compare them, and then using the proportion of wins as the reward for a particular trajectory. We demonstrate that on a suite of continuous control tasks, we are able to learn significantly more efficiently than reward-model based approaches while maintaining robustness to the intransitive and stochastic preferences that frequently occur in practice when aggregating human judgments. Most of this work was completed while GS was a Student Researcher at Google Research.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c311b2e3-0175-4ebc-945f-495437f52968Cited by top-tier papers80
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
- Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy DataFahim Tajwar, Anikait Singh, Archit Sharma, Rafael Rafailov et al.ICML 2024 · 189 citations
- Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference LearningSriyash Poddar, Yanming Wan, Hamish Ivison, Abhishek Gupta et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 188 citations
- Generalized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Offline AlignmentYunhao Tang, Zhaohan Daniel Guo, Zeyu Zheng, Daniele Calandriello et al.ICML 2024 · 159 citations
- RL on Incorrect Synthetic Data Scales the Efficiency of LLM Math Reasoning by Eight-FoldAmrith Setlur, Saurabh Garg, Xinyang Geng, Naman Garg et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 143 citations
Builds on10
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language ModelsZixiang Chen, Yihe Deng, Huizhuo Yuan, Kaixuan Ji et al.ICML 2024 · 527 citations
- PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-trainingKimin Lee, Laura M. Smith, Pieter AbbeelICML 2021 · 380 citations
- Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive StudyShusheng Xu, Wei Fu, Jiaxuan Gao, Wenjie Ye et al.ICML 2024 · 274 citations
- Independent Policy Gradient Methods for Competitive Reinforcement LearningConstantinos Daskalakis, Dylan J. Foster, Noah GolowichNeurIPS 2020 · 200 citations
Related papers
- MPO: An Efficient Post-Processing Framework for Mixing Diverse Preference AlignmentTianze Wang, Dongnan Gui, Yifan Hu, Shuhang Lin et al.ICML 2025
- Is RLHF More Difficult than Standard RL? A Theoretical PerspectiveYuanhao Wang, Qinghua Liu, Chi JinNeurIPS 2023
- Online Iterative Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with General Preference ModelChenlu Ye, Wei Xiong, Yuheng Zhang, Hanze Dong et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 60 citations
- Conditional Equivalence of DPO and RLHF: Assumptions, Failure Modes, and Provable AlignmentYonggang Zhang, Zhiqin Yang, Wei Xue, Dong Fang et al.ICML 2026
- Adversarial Policy Optimization for Offline Preference-based Reinforcement LearningHyungkyu Kang, Min-hwan OhICLR 2025
