Generalized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Offline Alignment
Yunhao Tang, Zhaohan Daniel Guo, Zeyu Zheng, Daniele Calandriello, Rémi Munos, Mark Rowland, Pierre Harvey Richemond, Michal Valko, Bernardo Ávila Pires, Bilal Piot
Abstract
Offline preference optimization allows fine-tuning large models directly from offline data, and has proved effective in recent alignment practices. We propose generalized preference optimization (GPO), a family of offline losses parameterized by a general class of convex functions. GPO enables a unified view over preference optimization, encompassing existing algorithms such as DPO, IPO and SLiC as special cases, while naturally introducing new variants. The GPO framework also sheds light on how offline algorithms enforce regularization, through the design of the convex function that defines the loss. Our analysis and experiments reveal the connections and subtle differences between the offline regularization and the KL divergence regularization intended by the canonical RLHF formulation. In a controlled setting akin to Gao et al. ( 2023 ), we also show that different GPO variants achieve similar trade-offs between regularization and performance, though the optimal values of hyper-parameter might differ as predicted by theory. In all, our results present new algorithmic toolkits and empirical insights to alignment practitioners.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 37dbfe40-3a67-4e79-a3c1-b0acb174db3cCited by top-tier papers60
- Normalized Rewards for Preference OptimizationShawn Im, Federico Danieli, Skyler Seto, Barry-John Theobald et al.ICML 2026 · 571 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization in Direct Alignment AlgorithmsRafael Rafailov, Yaswanth Chittepu, Ryan Park, Harshit Sikchi et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 169 citations
- On Softmax Direct Preference Optimization for RecommendationYuxin Chen, Junfei Tan, An Zhang, Zhengyi Yang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 126 citations
- Group Robust Preference Optimization in Reward-free RLHFShyam Sundhar Ramesh, Yifan Hu, Iason Chaimalas, Viraj Mehta et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 122 citations
- Human Alignment of Large Language Models through Online Preference OptimisationDaniele Calandriello, Zhaohan Daniel Guo, Rémi Munos, Mark Rowland et al.ICML 2024 · 90 citations
Builds on8
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 963 citations
- A Minimaximalist Approach to Reinforcement Learning from Human FeedbackGokul Swamy, Christoph Dann, Rahul Kidambi, Steven Wu et al.ICML 2024 · 147 citations
- Learning to summarize with human feedbackNisan Stiennon, Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Daniel M. Ziegler et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 124 citations
Related papers
- Correcting the Mythos of KL-Regularization: Direct Alignment without Overoptimization via Chi-Squared Preference OptimizationAudrey Huang, Wenhao Zhan, Tengyang Xie, Jason D. Lee et al.ICLR 2025
- Design Considerations in Offline Preference-based RLAlekh Agarwal, Christoph Dann, Teodor Vanislavov MarinovICML 2025
- Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-constraintWei Xiong, Hanze Dong, Chenlu Ye, Ziqi Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 346 citations
- Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial RegularizerZhihan Liu, Miao Lu, Shenao Zhang, Boyi Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 119 citations
- The Importance of Online Data: Understanding Preference Fine-tuning via CoverageYuda Song, Gokul Swamy, Aarti Singh, J. Andrew Bagnell et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 63 citations
