Correcting the Mythos of KL-Regularization: Direct Alignment without Overoptimization via Chi-Squared Preference Optimization
Audrey Huang, Wenhao Zhan, Tengyang Xie, Jason D. Lee, Wen Sun, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Dylan J. Foster
Abstract
Language model alignment methods such as reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) have led to impressive advances in language model capabilities, but are limited by a widely observed phenomenon known as overoptimization, where the quality of the language model degrades over the course of the alignment process. As the model optimizes performance with respect to an offline reward model, it overfits to inaccuracies and drifts away from preferred responses covered by the data. To discourage such distribution shift, KL-regularization is widely employed in existing offline alignment methods, but overoptimization continues to harm performance. Lending theoretical insight into the source of these empirical observations, we first show that the KL-regularization is too weak to prevent overfitting, then raise the following question: is it possible to design an efficient algorithm that is provably robust to overoptimization? We address this question with a new algorithm for offline alignment, χ 2 -Preference Optimization (χPO). χPO is a one-line change to Direct Preference Optimization (DPO; Rafailov et al. ( 2023 )), which only involves modifying the logarithmic link function in the DPO objective. Despite this minimal change, χPO implicitly implements the principle of pessimism in the face of uncertainty via regularization with the χ 2 -divergence-which quantifies uncertainty more effectively than KL-regularization-and provably alleviates overoptimization, achieving sample-complexity guarantees based on single-policy concentrability-the gold standard in offline reinforcement learning. χPO's simplicity and strong guarantees make it the first practical and general-purpose offline alignment algorithm that is provably robust to overoptimization.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers32
- Normalized Rewards for Preference OptimizationShawn Im, Federico Danieli, Skyler Seto, Barry-John Theobald et al.ICML 2026 · 571 citations
- All Roads Lead to Likelihood: The Value of Reinforcement Learning in Fine-TuningGokul Swamy, Sanjiban Choudhury, Wen Sun, Steven Wu et al.ICLR 2026 · 66 citations
- Inference-Time Reward Hacking in Large Language ModelsHadi Khalaf, Claudio Mayrink Verdun, Alex Oesterling, Himabindu Lakkaraju et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 38 citations
- Accelerating RL for LLM Reasoning with Optimal Advantage RegressionKianté Brantley, Mingyu Chen, Zhaolin Gao, Jason D. Lee et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 31 citations
- Distortion of AI Alignment: Does Preference Optimization Optimize for Preferences?Paul Gölz, Nika Haghtalab, Kunhe YangNeurIPS 2025 · 29 citations
Builds on44
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley et al.ICML 2023 · 1,822 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 963 citations
Related papers
- Exploratory Preference Optimization: Harnessing Implicit Q*-Approximation for Sample-Efficient RLHFTengyang Xie, Dylan J. Foster, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Corby Rosset et al.ICLR 2025
- Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-constraintWei Xiong, Hanze Dong, Chenlu Ye, Ziqi Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 346 citations
- Generalized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Offline AlignmentYunhao Tang, Zhaohan Daniel Guo, Zeyu Zheng, Daniele Calandriello et al.ICML 2024 · 159 citations
- Value-Incentivized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Online and Offline RLHFShicong Cen, Jincheng Mei, Katayoon Goshvadi, Hanjun Dai et al.ICLR 2025
- Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial RegularizerZhihan Liu, Miao Lu, Shenao Zhang, Boyi Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 119 citations
