Computing the Proportional Veto Core
Egor Ianovski, Aleksei Y. Kondratev
Abstract
In social choice there often arises a conflict between the majority principle (the search for a candidate that is as good as possible for as many voters as possible), and the protection of minority rights (choosing a candidate that is not overly bad for particular individuals or groups). In a context where the latter is our main concern, veto-based rules -giving individuals or groups the ability to strike off certain candidates from the list -are a natural and effective way of ensuring that no minority is left with an outcome they find untenable. However, such rules often fail to be anonymous, or impose specific restrictions on the number of voters and candidates. These issues can be addressed by considering the proportional veto core -the solution to a cooperative game where every coalition is given the power to veto a number of candidates proportional to its size. However, the naïve algorithm for the veto core is exponential, and the only known rule for selecting from the core, with an arbitrary number of voters, fails anonymity. In this paper we present a polynomial time algorithm for computing the core, study its expected size, and present an anonymous rule for selecting a candidate from it. We study the properties of core-consistent voting rules. Finally, we show that a pessimist can manipulate the core in polynomial time, while an optimist cannot manipulate it at all.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 32d143bb-b4b4-46ed-8723-ea372a53f216Cited by top-tier papers2
- Fair Federated Learning via the Proportional Veto CoreBhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Aniket Murhekar, Zhuowen Yuan, Bo Li et al.ICML 2024 · 14 citations
- Policy AggregationParand A. Alamdari, Soroush Ebadian, Ariel D. ProcacciaNeurIPS 2024 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Approximate Core for Committee Selection via Multilinear Extension and Market ClearingKamesh Munagala, Yiheng Shen, Kangning Wang, Zhiyi WangSODA 2022 · 14 citations
- Proportional Public DecisionsPiotr Skowron, Adrian GóreckiAAAI 2022 · 17 citations
- Locally Fair PartitioningPankaj K. Agarwal, Shao-Heng Ko, Kamesh Munagala, Erin TaylorAAAI 2022 · 3 citations
- Strategyproofness and Proportionality in Party-Approval Multiwinner ElectionsThéo Delemazure, Tom Demeulemeester, Manuel Eberl, Jonas Israel et al.AAAI 2023 · 13 citations
- Proportional Decisions in Perpetual VotingMartin Lackner, Jan MalyAAAI 2023 · 18 citations
