Information-Theoretic Reward Decomposition for Generalizable RLHF
Liyuan Mao, Haoran Xu, Amy Zhang, Weinan Zhang, Chenjia Bai
Abstract
A generalizable reward model is crucial in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) as it enables correctly evaluating unseen prompt-response pairs. However, existing reward models can lack this ability, as they are typically trained by increasing the reward gap between the chosen and rejected responses, while overlooking the prompts that the responses are conditioned on. Consequently, when the trained reward model is evaluated on prompt-response pairs that lie outside the data distribution, neglecting the effect of prompts may result in poor generalization of the reward model. To address this issue, we decompose the reward value into two independent components: prompt-free reward and prompt-related reward. Prompt-free reward represents the evaluation that is determined only by responses, while the prompt-related reward reflects the reward that derives from both the prompt and the response. We extract these two components from an information-theoretic perspective, which requires no extra models. Subsequently, we propose a new reward learning algorithm by prioritizing data samples based on their prompt-free reward values. Through toy examples, we demonstrate that the extracted prompt-free and prompt-related rewards effectively characterize the two parts of the reward value. Further, standard evaluations show that our method improves both the alignment performance and the generalization capability of the reward model.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7a0b75b0-2733-4b49-b11d-c90044f0cb72Builds on13
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
- Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable InformationKawin Ethayarajh, Yejin Choi, Swabha SwayamdiptaICML 2022 · 337 citations
- DeepSpeed- Inference: Enabling Efficient Inference of Transformer Models at Unprecedented ScaleReza Yazdani Aminabadi, Samyam Rajbhandari, Ammar Ahmad Awan, Cheng Li et al.SC 2022 · 276 citations
Related papers
- Iterative Data Smoothing: Mitigating Reward Overfitting and Overoptimization in RLHFBanghua Zhu, Michael I. Jordan, Jiantao JiaoICML 2024 · 53 citations
- Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference LearningSriyash Poddar, Yanming Wan, Hamish Ivison, Abhishek Gupta et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 188 citations
- Generative RLHF-V: Learning Principles from Multi-modal Human PreferenceJiayi Zhou, Jiaming Ji, Boyuan Chen, Jiapeng Sun et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- Unbiased Reward Modeling from Implicit Feedback for LLM AlignmentHao Wang, Haocheng Yang, Licheng Pan, Zhichao Chen et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Regularizing Hidden States Enables Learning Generalizable Reward Model for LLMsRui Yang, Ruomeng Ding, Yong Lin, Huan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 157 citations
