Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Information
Kawin Ethayarajh, Yejin Choi, Swabha Swayamdipta
Abstract
Estimating the difficulty of a dataset typically involves comparing state-of-the-art models to humans; the bigger the performance gap, the harder the dataset is said to be. However, this comparison provides little understanding of how difficult each instance in a given distribution is, or what attributes make the dataset difficult for a given model. To address these questions, we frame dataset difficulty-w.r.t. a model V-as the lack of V-usable information (Xu et al., 2019) , where a lower value indicates a more difficult dataset for V. We further introduce pointwise V-information (PVI) for measuring the difficulty of individual instances w.r.t. a given distribution. While standard evaluation metrics typically only compare different models for the same dataset, V-usable information and PVI also permit the converse: for a given model V, we can compare different datasets, as well as different instances/slices of the same dataset. Furthermore, our framework allows for the interpretability of different input attributes via transformations of the input, which we use to discover annotation artefacts in widely-used NLP benchmarks. Sentence Label PVI Wash you! No -4.616 Who achieved the best result was Angela. No -4.584 Sue gave to Bill a book. No -3.649 Only Churchill remembered Churchill giving the Blood, Sweat and Tears speech.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bc9ade11-a608-4032-9810-5fd38bf4355eCited by top-tier papers104
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
- AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language ModelsXiaogeng Liu, Nan Xu, Muhao Chen, Chaowei XiaoICLR 2024 · 722 citations
- RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI FeedbackHarrison Lee, Samrat Phatale, Hassan Mansoor, Thomas Mesnard et al.ICML 2024 · 598 citations
- LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation DatasetLianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Tianle Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 419 citations
- Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction FollowingZhiyuan Zeng, Jiatong Yu, Tianyu Gao, Yu Meng et al.ICLR 2024 · 299 citations
Builds on14
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- On the Stability of Fine-tuning BERT: Misconceptions, Explanations, and Strong BaselinesMarius Mosbach, Maksym Andriushchenko, Dietrich KlakowICLR 2021 · 448 citations
- Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin RankingGeoff Pleiss, Tianyi Zhang, Ethan R. Elenberg, Kilian Q. WeinbergerNeurIPS 2020 · 398 citations
- Adversarial Filters of Dataset BiasesRonan Le Bras, Swabha Swayamdipta, Chandra Bhagavatula, Rowan Zellers et al.ICML 2020 · 242 citations
- A Theory of Usable Information under Computational ConstraintsYilun Xu, Shengjia Zhao, Jiaming Song, Russell Stewart et al.ICLR 2020 · 211 citations
Related papers
- RepMatch: Quantifying Cross-Instance Similarities in Representation SpaceMohammad Modarres, Sina Abbasi, Mohammad Taher PilehvarEMNLP 2024
- HUME: Measuring the Human-Model Performance Gap in Text Embedding TasksAdnan El Assadi, Isaac Chung, Roman Solomatin, Niklas Muennighoff et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Your Model is Overconfident, and Other Lies We Tell OurselvesTimothee Mickus, Aman Sinha, Raúl VázquezACL 2025
- When AI Difficulty Is Easy: The Explanatory Power of Predicting IRT DifficultyFernando Martínez-Plumed, David Castellano Falcón, Carlos Monserrat Aranda, José Hernández-OralloAAAI 2022 · 18 citations
- Interpretable Multi-dataset Evaluation for Named Entity RecognitionJinlan Fu, Pengfei Liu, Graham NeubigEMNLP 2020 · 49 citations
