Towards Better Understanding of Training Certifiably Robust Models against Adversarial Examples
Sungyoon Lee, Woojin Lee, Jinseong Park, Jaewook Lee
Abstract
We study the problem of training certifiably robust models against adversarial examples. Certifiable training minimizes an upper bound on the worst-case loss over the allowed perturbation, and thus the tightness of the upper bound is an important factor in building certifiably robust models. However, many studies have shown that Interval Bound Propagation (IBP) training uses much looser bounds but outperforms other models that use tighter bounds. We identify another key factor that influences the performance of certifiable training: smoothness of the loss landscape. We find significant differences in the loss landscapes across many linear relaxation-based methods, and that the current state-of-the-arts method often has a landscape with favorable optimization properties. Moreover, to test the claim, we design a new certifiable training method with the desired properties. With the tightness and the smoothness, the proposed method achieves a decent performance under a wide range of perturbations, while others with only one of the two factors can perform well only for a specific range of perturbations. Our code is available at https://github.com/sungyoon-lee/LossLandscapeMatters .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7784a67e-a757-467d-99e5-429f468d9015Cited by top-tier papers6
- Expressive Losses for Verified Robustness via Convex CombinationsAlessandro De Palma, Rudy Bunel, Krishnamurthy (Dj) Dvijotham, M. Pawan Kumar et al.ICLR 2024 · 27 citations
- Differentially Private Sharpness-Aware TrainingJinseong Park, Hoki Kim, Yujin Choi, Jaewook LeeICML 2023 · 15 citations
- UniT: A Unified Look at Certified Robust Training against Text Adversarial PerturbationMuchao Ye, Ziyi Yin, Tianrong Zhang, Tianyu Du et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 3 citations
- SoK: Certified Robustness for Deep Neural NetworksLinyi Li, Tao Xie, Bo LiS&P 2023
- CTBench: A Library and Benchmark for Certified TrainingYuhao Mao, Stefan Balauca, Martin T. VechevICML 2025
Builds on15
- Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural NetworksNicolas Papernot, Patrick D. McDaniel, Xi Wu, Somesh Jha et al.S&P 2016 · 3,275 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example DefensesFlorian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Wieland Brendel, Aleksander MadryNeurIPS 2020 · 1,026 citations
- Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential PrivacyMathias Lécuyer, Vaggelis Atlidakis, Roxana Geambasu, Daniel Hsu et al.S&P 2019 · 1,022 citations
- Adversarial Weight Perturbation Helps Robust GeneralizationDongxian Wu, Shu-Tao Xia, Yisen WangNeurIPS 2020 · 917 citations
Related papers
- Understanding Certified Training with Interval Bound PropagationYuhao Mao, Mark Niklas Müller, Marc Fischer, Martin T. VechevICLR 2024 · 26 citations
- On the Convergence of Certified Robust Training with Interval Bound PropagationYihan Wang, Zhouxing Shi, Quanquan Gu, Cho-Jui HsiehICLR 2022 · 11 citations
- Towards Stable and Efficient Training of Verifiably Robust Neural NetworksHuan Zhang, Hongge Chen, Chaowei Xiao, Sven Gowal et al.ICLR 2020 · 384 citations
- Scalable Verified Training for Provably Robust Image ClassificationSven Gowal, Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, Robert Stanforth, Rudy Bunel et al.ICCV 2019 · 196 citations
- Lipschitz-Certifiable Training with a Tight Outer BoundSungyoon Lee, Jaewook Lee, Saerom ParkNeurIPS 2020 · 23 citations
