Locate-then-Sparsify: Attribution Guided Sparse Strategy for Visual Hallucination Mitigation
Tiantian Dang, Chao Bi, Shufan Shen, Jinzhe Liu, Qingming Huang, Shuhui Wang
Abstract
Despite the significant advancements in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), their tendency to generate hallucinations undermines reliability and restricts broader practical deployment. Among the hallucination mitigation methods, feature steering emerges as a promising approach that reduces erroneous outputs in LVLMs without increasing inference costs. However, current methods apply uniform feature steering across all layers. This heuristic strategy ignores inter-layer differences, potentially disrupting layers unrelated to hallucinations and ultimately leading to performance degradation on general tasks. In this paper, we propose Locate-Then-Sparsify for Feature Steering (LTS-FS), a plug-and-play framework which controls the steering intensity according to the hallucination relevance of each layer. We first construct a dataset comprising token-level and sentence-level hallucination cases. Based on this dataset, we introduce an attribution method based on causal interventions to quantify the hallucination relevance of each layer. With the attribution scores across layers, we propose a layerwise strategy that converts these scores into feature steering intensities for individual layers, enabling more precise adjustments specifically on hallucination-relevant layers. Extensive experiments across multiple LVLMs and benchmarks demonstrate that LTS-FS effectively mitigates hallucination while preserving strong performance. Codes are available at https://github. com/huttersadan/LTS-FS.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 76b0736d-9805-4b4d-b2fc-0e8e90c57a13Builds on18
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot LearningJean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jeff Donahue, Pauline Luc, Antoine Miech et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 6,707 citations
- Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language ModelKenneth Li, Oam Patel, Fernanda B. Viégas, Hanspeter Pfister et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,549 citations
- Mitigating Hallucination in Large Multi-Modal Models via Robust Instruction TuningFuxiao Liu, Kevin Lin, Linjie Li, Jianfeng Wang et al.ICLR 2024 · 476 citations
- Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language ModelsYifan Li, Yifan Du, Kun Zhou, Jinpeng Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 344 citations
Related papers
- Steer Where It Matters: Token-Level Visual-Sensitivity Steering for LVLMs Hallucination Mitigationruipeng zhang, Zhihao Li, C.L.Philip Chen, Tong ZhangICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Finding the Correct Visual Evidence Without Forgetting: Mitigating Hallucination in LVLMs via Inter-Layer Visual Attention DiscrepancyYutong Xie, Zhenglin Hua, Ran Wang, Wing W. Y. Ng et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Same Attention, Different Truths: Put Logit-Lens over Visual Attention to Detect and Mitigate LVLM Object HallucinationZichuan Wang, Songlin Yang, Bo Peng, Zhenchen Tang et al.CVPR 2026 · 4 citations
- Prefill-Time Intervention for Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision-Language ModelsChengsheng Zhang, Chenghao Sun, Xinyan Jiang, Wei Li et al.CVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- DiVE: Decoupling Intra-layer Visual Evidence for Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language ModelsXinwei Li, Li Lin, Hui Jiao, Li Yao et al.ACL 2026
