Finding the Correct Visual Evidence Without Forgetting: Mitigating Hallucination in LVLMs via Inter-Layer Visual Attention Discrepancy
Yutong Xie, Zhenglin Hua, Ran Wang, Wing W. Y. Ng, Xizhao Wang, Yuheng Jia
Abstract
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have shown remarkable performance on a wide range of vision-language tasks. Despite this progress, they are still prone to hallucination, generating responses that are inconsistent with visual content. In this work, we find that LVLMs tend to hallucinate when they pay insufficient attention to the correct visual evidence and gradually forget it during the generation process. We empirically find that although LVLMs overall attend insufficiently to visual evidence, they exhibit sensitivity to the correct visual evidence in specific layers, with notable inter-layer discrepancy. Motivated by this observation, we propose a novel hallucination mitigation method that enhances visual evidence based on I nter- L ayer V isual A ttention D iscrepancy ( ILVAD ). Specifically, we obtain the attention weights from early generated tokens to visual tokens across layers and identify the tokens that are repeatedly activated as visual evidence, forming a saliency map. We then enhance attention to visual evidence during generation through the saliency map to reduce visual forgetting. In addition, we leverage the saliency map to obtain attention scores of generated text to visual evidence, in order to select and emphasize text tokens that are strongly grounded in visual evidence. Our method is training-free and plug-and-play. Multiple benchmark evaluations conducted on five recently released models show that our method can consistently mitigate hallucinations in different LVLMs over various architectures. Code is available at https://github.com/ytx-ML/ILVAD.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8a52b4e1-d2db-421a-8f24-de21a4ca5fdeBuilds on24
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language ModelsDeyao Zhu, Jun Chen, Xiaoqian Shen, Xiang Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,079 citations
- Grounding Multimodal Large Language Models to the WorldZhiliang Peng, Wenhui Wang, Li Dong, Yaru Hao et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,170 citations
- Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language ModelsYifan Li, Yifan Du, Kun Zhou, Jinpeng Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 344 citations
- Tell Your Model Where to Attend: Post-hoc Attention Steering for LLMsQingru Zhang, Chandan Singh, Liyuan Liu, Xiaodong Liu et al.ICLR 2024 · 76 citations
Related papers
- Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Assembly of Global and Local AttentionWenbin An, Feng Tian, Sicong Leng, Jiahao Nie et al.CVPR 2025
- Same Attention, Different Truths: Put Logit-Lens over Visual Attention to Detect and Mitigate LVLM Object HallucinationZichuan Wang, Songlin Yang, Bo Peng, Zhenchen Tang et al.CVPR 2026 · 4 citations
- AdaIAT: Adaptively Increasing Attention to Generated Text to Alleviate Hallucinations in LVLMLian Zhong, Ziqiang He, Jibin Zheng, Jin Li et al.CVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- Not All Tokens and Heads Are Equally Important: Dual-Level Attention Intervention for Hallucination MitigationLexiang Tang, Xianwei Zhuang, Bang Yang, Zhiyuan Hu et al.AAAI 2026 · 8 citations
- DiVE: Decoupling Intra-layer Visual Evidence for Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language ModelsXinwei Li, Li Lin, Hui Jiao, Li Yao et al.ACL 2026
