Same Attention, Different Truths: Put Logit-Lens over Visual Attention to Detect and Mitigate LVLM Object Hallucination
Zichuan Wang, Songlin Yang, Bo Peng, Zhenchen Tang, Yang Li, Beibei Dong, Jing Dong
Abstract
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) often suffer from object hallucination, generating objects that are absent from the image. Prior work largely attributes this to insufficient visual attention. However, we find that both real and hallucinated objects receive equally strong visual attention in the model's mid-to-late layers, suggesting that the key issue may not be how much the model attends, but what it attends to and why. To this end, we decode the visual features of high-attention regions using Logit Lens, and observe that regions corresponding to real objects can be correctly decoded to the target object tokens, whereas those for hallucinated objects cannot. Building on this, we identify two hallucination mechanisms: (i) visual uncertainty, triggered by semantically similar or confusable regions; masking these regions eliminates the hallucination. (ii) contextual prior, triggered by strong co-occurrence priors; even when the initially attended region is masked, the hallucination persists and attention drifts to other regions. Based on these findings, we propose a simple yet effective training-free Detect-Mitigate framework comprising a Logit-Lens Consistency Check to detect hallucination and targeted remedies: High-Attention Regions Masking (HARM) for visual uncertainty hallucination, and Visual Evidence Enhanced Decoding (VEED) for contextual prior hallucination. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art results on multiple hallucination benchmarks. Code will be available.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on30
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language ModelsJunnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, Steven C. H. HoiICML 2023 · 7,873 citations
- Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot LearningJean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jeff Donahue, Pauline Luc, Antoine Miech et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 6,707 citations
- InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction TuningWenliang Dai, Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Anthony Meng Huat Tiong et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,013 citations
Related papers
- SHIELD: Suppressing Hallucinations In LVLM Encoders via Bias and Vulnerability DefenseYiyang Huang, Liang Shi, Yitian Zhang, Yi Xu et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Multi-Frequency Contrastive Decoding: Alleviating Hallucinations for Large Vision-Language ModelsBingqian Liu, Fu Zhang, Guoqing Chen, Jingwei ChengEMNLP 2025
- Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive DecodingSicong Leng, Hang Zhang, Guanzheng Chen, Xin Li et al.CVPR 2024
- Residual Decoding: Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models via History-Aware Residual GuidanceXinrong Chen, Xu Chu, Yingmin Qiu, Hengyuan Zhang et al.CVPR 2026 · 8 citations
- HELPD: Mitigating Hallucination of LVLMs by Hierarchical Feedback Learning with Vision-enhanced Penalty DecodingFan Yuan, Chi Qin, Xiaogang Xu, Piji LiEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
