Agentic Confidence Calibration
Jiaxin Zhang, Caiming Xiong, Chien-Sheng Wu
Abstract
AI agents are rapidly advancing from passive language models to autonomous systems executing complex, multi-step tasks. Yet their overconfidence in failure remains a fundamental barrier to deployment in high-stakes settings. Existing calibration methods, built for static single-turn outputs, cannot address the unique challenges of agentic systems, such as compounding errors along trajectories, uncertainty from external tools, and opaque failure modes. To address these challenges, we introduce, for the first time, the problem of Agentic Confidence Calibration and propose Holistic Trajectory Calibration (HTC), a novel diagnostic framework that extracts rich process-level features ranging from macro dynamics to micro stability across an agent's entire trajectory. Powered by a simple, interpretable model, HTC consistently surpasses strong baselines in both calibration and discrimination, across eight benchmarks, multiple LLMs, and diverse agent frameworks. Beyond performance, HTC delivers three essential advances: it provides interpretability by revealing the signals behind failure, enables transferability by applying across domains without retraining, and achieves generalization through a General Agent Calibrator (GAC) that achieves the best calibration (lowest ECE) on the out-of-domain GAIA benchmark. Together, these contributions establish a new process-centric paradigm for confidence calibration, providing a framework for diagnosing and enhancing the reliability of AI agents.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7584fa85-d40f-4ec2-9dd3-cd4d7e77ac35Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on8
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as AgentsXiao Liu, Hao Yu, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu et al.ICLR 2024 · 748 citations
- GAIA: a benchmark for General AI AssistantsGrégoire Mialon, Clémentine Fourrier, Thomas Wolf, Yann LeCun et al.ICLR 2024 · 716 citations
- Deep Think with ConfidenceYichao Fu, Xuewei Wang, Hao Zhang, Yuandong Tian et al.ICLR 2026 · 171 citations
Related papers
- Confidence Should Be Calibrated More Than One Turn DeepZhaohan Zhang, Chengzhengxu Li, Xiaoming Liu, Chao Shen et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- Towards Self-Evolving Agent Benchmarks : Validatable Agent Trajectory via Test-Time ExplorationDadi Guo, Tianyi Zhou, Dongrui Liu, Chen Qian et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Calibrating Large Language Models Using Their Generations OnlyDennis Ulmer, Martin Gubri, Hwaran Lee, Sangdoo Yun et al.ACL 2024
- AgenTracer: Who Is Inducing Failure in the LLM Agentic Systems?Guibin Zhang, Junhao Wang, Junjie Chen, Wangchunshu Zhou et al.ICLR 2026 · 107 citations
- MetaFaith: Faithful Natural Language Uncertainty Expression in LLMsGabrielle Kaili-May Liu, Gal Yona, Avi Caciularu, Idan Szpektor et al.EMNLP 2025
