Towards Self-Evolving Agent Benchmarks : Validatable Agent Trajectory via Test-Time Exploration
Dadi Guo, Tianyi Zhou, Dongrui Liu, Chen Qian, Qihan Ren, Shuai Shao, Zhiyuan Fan, Yi R. Fung, Kun Wang, Linfeng Zhang, Jing Shao
Abstract
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) and agent system designs have empowered agents with unprecedented levels of capability. However, existing agent benchmarks are showing a trend of rapid ceiling-hitting by newly developed agents, making it increasingly difficult to meet the demands of evaluating agent abilities. To address this problem, we propose the Trajectory-based Validated-by-Reproducing Agent-benchmark Complexity Evolution (TRACE) framework. This framework takes an original task from an existing benchmark and encourages agents to freely explore and evolve it into a new task with higher difficulty while recording the corresponding execution trajectories. The framework proceeds in three stages: (1) evolutionary proposal mining, which generates task evolution proposals through preliminary exploration and divergent thinking; (2) problem construction via free exploration, where proposals are instantiated into concrete problem instances through agent exploration, with execution trajectories recorded along the process; and (3) multi-level validation, which ensures that the evolved tasks are accompanied by reproducible and logically coherent trajectories. Experiments on the GAIA benchmark demonstrate that the TRACE framework consistently enhances task complexity while improving correctness reliability through trajectory-level validation. In addition, our framework can successfully adapt to and improve reasoning benchmarks such as AIME-2024. This work marks a paradigm shift from static, manually curated benchmarks to dynamic, self-evolving evaluation systems, providing a sustainable and challenging foundation for agent development. Code and data can be found at https://github.com/titanwings/trace-benchmark-evolving.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 76b67337-5d3f-4f62-8928-ad79a0db35c9Builds on8
- GAIA: a benchmark for General AI AssistantsGrégoire Mialon, Clémentine Fourrier, Thomas Wolf, Yann LeCun et al.ICLR 2024 · 716 citations
- SynLogic: Synthesizing Verifiable Reasoning Data at Scale for Learning Logical Reasoning and BeyondJunteng Liu, Yuanxiang Fan, Zhuo Jiang, Han Ding et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 49 citations
- CostBench: Evaluating Multi-Turn Cost-Optimal Planning and Adaptation in Dynamic Environments for LLM Tool-Use AgentsJiayu Liu, Cheng Qian, Zhaochen Su, Qing Zong et al.ACL 2026 · 19 citations
- Mathematical Proof as a Litmus Test: Revealing Failure Modes of Advanced Large Reasoning ModelsDadi Guo, Jiayu Liu, Zhiyuan Fan, Zhitao He et al.ACL 2026 · 17 citations
- MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning EngineeringJun Shern Chan, Neil Chowdhury, Oliver Jaffe, James Aung et al.ICLR 2025 · 9 citations
Related papers
- From Static Benchmarks to Dynamic Protocol: Agent-Centric Text Anomaly Detection for Evaluating LLM ReasoningSeungdong Yoa, Sanghyu Yoon, Suhee Yoon, Dongmin Kim et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- DARG: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models via Adaptive Reasoning GraphZhehao Zhang, Jiaao Chen, Diyi YangNeurIPS 2024 · 42 citations
- Beyond the Final Answer: Evaluating the Reasoning Trajectories of Tool-Augmented AgentsWonjoong Kim, Sangwu Park, Yeonjun In, Sein Kim et al.ICML 2026 · 15 citations
- SE-Agent: Self-Evolution Trajectory Optimization in Multi-Step Reasoning with LLM-Based AgentsYifu Guo, Jiaye Lin, Huacan Wang, Yuzhen Han et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 73 citations
- TaskCraft: Automated Generation of Agentic TasksDingfeng Shi, Jingyi Cao, Qianben Chen, Weichen Sun et al.ICLR 2026 · 49 citations
