SenseMyStreet: Sensor Commissioning Toolkit for Communities
Aare Puussaar, Kyle Montague, Sean Peacock, Thomas Nappey, Robert Anderson, Jennine Jonczyk, Peter C. Wright, Philip James
Abstract
The rise of big data and smart sensing, with the promise of more educated and informed decisions, has fuelled a shift towards more data-driven decision-making in local and national government. However, we are observing a disconnect between the people who are affected by these decisions and their access to tools and resources to collect data in order to provide the needed evidence for change. To truly democratise this process and for citizens to become active prosumers of data, new mechanisms of citizen data production are needed. In this paper we report on a two-year ethnographic and iterative co-design process with the local community. This work encompassed the design, development and deployment of SenseMyStreet (SeMS), a bespoke sensor commissioning toolkit that enables citizens and community groups to use and commission a city's scientific-grade environmental monitors, determining where they will be located on their streets and collecting data to evidence hyper-local issues. Unlike prior research, which creates alternative data sources to contest city data, our toolkit helps integrate citizen commissioned data into the city datasets used by citizens and decision-makers. Reflecting on the design process and evaluating the ways people engaged with the digital tools of the toolkit, we highlight how commissioning can be configured to promote equity in the smart city, empower citizens to take ownership of issues and facilitate the creation of community networks that utilise the data for local benefit.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 73cd3997-3dc8-42ba-9b58-2ea8485ad6a5Cited by top-tier papers2
- A Systematic Literature Review on Equity and Technology in HCI and Fairness: Navigating the Complexities and Nuances of Equity ResearchSeyun Kim, Yuanchen Bai, Haiyi Zhu, Motahhare EslamiCSCW 2025 · 14 citations
- Communicating the Privacy-Utility Trade-off: Supporting Informed Data Donation with Privacy Decision Interfaces for Differential PrivacyDaniel Franzen, Claudia Müller-Birn, Odette WegwarthCSCW 2024 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Opening the Gate to Urban Repair: A Tool for Citizen-Led DesignSarah Cooney, Barath RaghavanCSCW 2022 · 7 citations
- Place-Based Policymaking and HCI: Opportunities and Challenges for Technology DesignJennifer Manuel, Clara CrivellaroCHI 2020 · 38 citations
- Signs of the Smart City: Exploring the Limits and Opportunities of TransparencyEric Corbett, Graham DoveCHI 2024 · 7 citations
- The "Three-Legged Stool": Designing for Equitable City, Community, and Research Partnerships in Urban Environmental SensingMadeleine I. G. Daepp, Alex Cabral, Tiffany M. Werner, Raed Mansour et al.CHI 2023 · 20 citations
- Reconfiguring Data Relations: Institutional Dynamics around Data in Local GovernanceSeolha Lee, Paul DourishCSCW 2024 · 11 citations
