Mixing Expert Knowledge: Bring Human Thoughts Back To the Game of Go
Yichuan Ma, Linyang Li, Yongkang Chen, Peiji Li, Jiasheng Ye, Qipeng Guo, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance in reasoning tasks such as mathematics and coding, matching or surpassing human capabilities. However, these impressive reasoning abilities face significant challenges in specialized domains. Taking Go as an example, although AlphaGo has established the high performance ceiling of AI systems in Go, mainstream LLMs still struggle to reach even beginner-level proficiency, let alone perform natural language reasoning. This performance gap between general-purpose LLMs and domain experts is significantly limiting the application of LLMs on a wider range of domain-specific tasks. In this work, we aim to bridge the divide between LLMs'general reasoning capabilities and expert knowledge in domain-specific tasks. We perform mixed fine-tuning with structured Go expertise and general long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning data as a cold start, followed by reinforcement learning to integrate expert knowledge in Go with general reasoning capabilities. Through this methodology, we present LoGos, a powerful LLM that not only maintains outstanding general reasoning abilities, but also conducts Go gameplay in natural language, demonstrating effective strategic reasoning and accurate next-move prediction. LoGos achieves performance comparable to human professional players, substantially surpassing all existing LLMs. Through this work, we aim to contribute insights on applying general LLM reasoning capabilities to specialized domains. We will release the first large-scale Go dataset for LLM training, the first LLM Go evaluation benchmark, and the first general LLM that reaches human professional-level performance in Go at: https://github.com/Entarochuan/LoGos.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7213ae60-7124-4dcb-9295-7db8165dc3d8Builds on6
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models Play StarCraft II: Benchmarks and A Chain of Summarization ApproachWeiyu Ma, Qirui Mi, Yongcheng Zeng, Xue Yan et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 122 citations
- HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF FrameworkGuangming Sheng, Chi Zhang, Zilingfeng Ye, Xibin Wu et al.EuroSys 2025 · 61 citations
- Mastering Board Games by External and Internal Planning with Language ModelsJohn Schultz, Jakub Adámek, Matej Jusup, Marc Lanctot et al.ICML 2025
- KOR-Bench: Benchmarking Language Models on Knowledge-Orthogonal Reasoning TasksKaijing Ma, Xeron Du, Yunran Wang, Haoran Zhang et al.ICLR 2025
Related papers
- GPO: Learning from Critical Steps to Improve LLM ReasoningJiahao Yu, Zelei Cheng, Xian Wu, Xinyu XingNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- DeepOR: A Deep Reasoning Foundation Model for Optimization ModelingZiyang Xiao, Yuan Jessica Wang, Xiongwei Han, Shisi Guan et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Hybrid Latent Reasoning via Reinforcement LearningZhenrui Yue, Bowen Jin, Huimin Zeng, Honglei Zhuang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 28 citations
- How Far Are LLMs from Professional Poker Players? Revisiting Game-Theoretic Reasoning with Agentic Tool UseMinhua Lin, Enyan Dai, Hui Liu, Xianfeng Tang et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Unlocking General Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models via Representation EngineeringXinyu Tang, Xiaolei Wang, Zhihao Lv, Yingqian Min et al.ACL 2025
