GPO: Learning from Critical Steps to Improve LLM Reasoning
Jiahao Yu, Zelei Cheng, Xian Wu, Xinyu Xing
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in various domains, showing impressive potential on different tasks. Recently, reasoning LLMs have been proposed to improve the reasoning or thinking capabilities of LLMs to solve complex problems. Despite the promising results of reasoning LLMs, enhancing the multi-step reasoning capabilities of LLMs still remains a significant challenge. While existing optimization methods have advanced the LLM reasoning capabilities, they often treat reasoning trajectories as a whole, without considering the underlying critical steps within the trajectory. In this paper, we introduce Guided Pivotal Optimization (GPO), a novel fine-tuning strategy that dives into the reasoning process to enable more effective improvements. GPO first identifies the `critical step'within a reasoning trajectory - a point that the model must carefully proceed to succeed at the problem. We locate the critical step by estimating the advantage function. GPO then resets the policy to the critical step, samples the new rollout and prioritizes the learning process on those rollouts. This focus allows the model to learn more effectively from pivotal moments within the reasoning process to improve the reasoning performance. We demonstrate that GPO is a general strategy that can be integrated with various optimization methods to improve reasoning performance. Besides theoretical analysis, our experiments across challenging reasoning benchmarks show that GPO can consistently and significantly enhance the performance of existing optimization methods, showcasing its effectiveness and generalizability in improving LLM reasoning by concentrating on pivotal moments within the generation process.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 485f2d37-7dbb-4938-9201-e10414dd7a6dBuilds on34
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
Related papers
- DOTS: Learning to Reason Dynamically in LLMs via Optimal Reasoning Trajectories SearchMurong Yue, Wenlin Yao, Haitao Mi, Dian Yu et al.ICLR 2025
- Learning Planning-based Reasoning by Trajectories Collection and Process Reward SynthesizingFangkai Jiao, Chengwei Qin, Zhengyuan Liu, Nancy F. Chen et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Plan Then Action: High-Level Planning Guidance Reinforcement Learning for LLM ReasoningZhihao Dou, Qinjian Zhao, Zhongwei Wan, Zhang Dinggen et al.ICML 2026 · 24 citations
- ReActR: Reasoning through Error-Activated Reflection for LLM Post-TrainingLina SunACL 2026
- Hybrid Latent Reasoning via Reinforcement LearningZhenrui Yue, Bowen Jin, Huimin Zeng, Honglei Zhuang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 28 citations
