ReActR: Reasoning through Error-Activated Reflection for LLM Post-Training
Lina Sun
Abstract
Although Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated substantial proficiency in reasoning, current approaches focus disproportionately on scaling correct training samples, underexploring the value of incorrect reasoning trajectories. Motivated by how humans learn from mistakes, we propose ReActR (Reasoning through Error-Activated Reflection), a framework that enhances reasoning by learning reflective behaviors from erroneous trajectories. Specifically, ReActR comprises data construction and training. First, we synthesize multi-turn erroneous reasoning dataset spanning diverse error types and difficult levels via self-generation and targeted error generation. Second, we enhance the model's capabilities through Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on synthesized data and then apply Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with multiple reward signals to further refine reasoning performance. Extensive experiments across five benchmarks and three LLMs demonstrate that ReActR effectively enhances reasoning performance. Notably, on Llama-3-8B, Re-ActR achieves an average improvement of 3.5% across the five datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5329a6f9-47d2-4956-a256-ab71c00d1047Builds on17
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent DebateYilun Du, Shuang Li, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B. Tenenbaum et al.ICML 2024 · 1,562 citations
- Teaching Large Language Models to Self-DebugXinyun Chen, Maxwell Lin, Nathanael Schärli, Denny ZhouICLR 2024 · 1,085 citations
- Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning YetJie Huang, Xinyun Chen, Swaroop Mishra, Huaixiu Steven Zheng et al.ICLR 2024 · 858 citations
Related papers
- SRPO: Enhancing Multimodal LLM Reasoning via Reflection-Aware Reinforcement LearningZhongwei Wan, Zhihao Dou, Che Liu, Yu Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 63 citations
- GPO: Learning from Critical Steps to Improve LLM ReasoningJiahao Yu, Zelei Cheng, Xian Wu, Xinyu XingNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- Can LLMs Learn from Previous Mistakes? Investigating LLMs' Errors to Boost for ReasoningYongqi Tong, Dawei Li, Sizhe Wang, Yujia Wang et al.ACL 2024
- Plan Then Action: High-Level Planning Guidance Reinforcement Learning for LLM ReasoningZhihao Dou, Qinjian Zhao, Zhongwei Wan, Zhang Dinggen et al.ICML 2026 · 24 citations
- Empowering Multi-Turn Tool-Integrated Agentic Reasoning with Group Turn Policy OptimizationYifeng Ding, Hung Le, Songyang Han, Kangrui Ruan et al.ACL 2026 · 5 citations
