Large Language Models Play StarCraft II: Benchmarks and A Chain of Summarization Approach
Weiyu Ma, Qirui Mi, Yongcheng Zeng, Xue Yan, Runji Lin, Yuqiao Wu, Jun Wang, Haifeng Zhang
Abstract
StarCraft II is a challenging benchmark for AI agents due to the necessity of both precise micro level operations and strategic macro awareness. Previous works, such as Alphastar and SCC, achieve impressive performance on tackling StarCraft II , however, still exhibit deficiencies in long term strategic planning and strategy interpretability. Emerging large language model (LLM) agents, such as Voyage and MetaGPT, presents the immense potential in solving intricate tasks. Motivated by this, we aim to validate the capabilities of LLMs on StarCraft II, a highly complex RTS game.To conveniently take full advantage of LLMs reasoning abilities, we first develop textual StratCraft II environment, called TextStarCraft II, which LLM agent can interact. Secondly, we propose a Chain of Summarization method, including single frame summarization for processing raw observations and multi frame summarization for analyzing game information, providing command recommendations, and generating strategic decisions. Our experiment consists of two parts: first, an evaluation by human experts, which includes assessing the LLMss mastery of StarCraft II knowledge and the performance of LLM agents in the game; second, the in game performance of LLM agents, encompassing aspects like win rate and the impact of Chain of Summarization.Experiment results demonstrate that: 1. LLMs possess the relevant knowledge and complex planning abilities needed to address StarCraft II scenarios; 2. Human experts consider the performance of LLM agents to be close to that of an average player who has played StarCraft II for eight years; 3. LLM agents are capable of defeating the built in AI at the Harder(Lv5) difficulty level. We have open sourced the code and released demo videos of LLM agent playing StarCraft II.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 51a329fc-492b-4948-aeaf-80c9eef3e5caCited by top-tier papers23
- FinCon: A Synthesized LLM Multi-Agent System with Conceptual Verbal Reinforcement for Enhanced Financial Decision MakingYangyang Yu, Zhiyuan Yao, Haohang Li, Zhiyang Deng et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 197 citations
- Language Agents with Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Play in the Werewolf GameZelai Xu, Chao Yu, Fei Fang, Yu Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 145 citations
- Orak: A Foundational Benchmark for Training and Evaluating LLM Agents on Diverse Video GamesDongmin Park, Minkyu Kim, Beongjun Choi, Junhyuck Kim et al.ICLR 2026 · 30 citations
- Learning to Discuss Strategically: A Case Study on One Night Ultimate WerewolfXuanfa Jin, Ziyan Wang, Yali Du, Meng Fang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 28 citations
- Mechanism Design for LLM Fine-tuning with Multiple Reward ModelsHaoran Sun, Yurong Chen, Siwei Wang, Chu Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 26 citations
Builds on9
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive LearningMohit Shridhar, Xingdi Yuan, Marc-Alexandre Côté, Yonatan Bisk et al.ICLR 2021 · 819 citations
- Token-level Direct Preference OptimizationYongcheng Zeng, Guoqing Liu, Weiyu Ma, Ning Yang et al.ICML 2024 · 136 citations
Related papers
- LLM-PySC2: Starcraft II learning environment for Large Language ModelsZongyuan Li, Yanan Ni, Runnan Qi, Chang Lu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 15 citations
- Large Language Models Are Neurosymbolic ReasonersMeng Fang, Shilong Deng, Yudi Zhang, Zijing Shi et al.AAAI 2024 · 53 citations
- Mixing Expert Knowledge: Bring Human Thoughts Back To the Game of GoYichuan Ma, Linyang Li, Yongkang Chen, Peiji Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- GAMEBoT: Transparent Assessment of LLM Reasoning in GamesWenye Lin, Jonathan Roberts, Yunhan Yang, Samuel Albanie et al.ACL 2025 · 12 citations
- Agentic Video Summarization via Self-Reflecting Multimodal UnderstandingMiaotian Guo, Shuguang Dou, Yin Li, Aidong Men et al.CVPR 2026
