UniTSyn: A Large-Scale Dataset Capable of Enhancing the Prowess of Large Language Models for Program Testing
Yifeng He, Jiabo Huang, Yuyang Rong, Yiwen Guo, Ethan Wang, Hao Chen
Abstract
The remarkable capability of large language models (LLMs) in generating high-quality code has drawn increasing attention in the software testing community. However, existing code LLMs often demonstrate unsatisfactory capabilities in generating accurate and complete tests since they were trained on code snippets collected without differentiating between code for testing purposes and other code. In this paper, we present a large-scale dataset UniTSyn, which is capable of enhancing the prowess of LLMs for Unit Test Synthesis. Associating tests with the tested functions is crucial for LLMs to infer the expected behavior and the logic paths to be verified. By leveraging Language Server Protocol, UniTSyn achieves the challenging goal of collecting focal-test pairs without perproject execution setups or per-language heuristics that tend to be fragile and difficult to scale. It contains 2.7 million focal-test pairs across five mainstream programming languages, making it possible to be utilized for enhancing the test generation ability of LLMs. The details of UniTSyn can be found in Table 1 . Our experiments demonstrate that, by building an autoregressive model based on UniTSyn, we can achieve significant benefits in learning and understanding unit test representations, resulting in improved generation accuracy and code coverage across all evaluated programming languages. Code and data will be publicly available.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6e05fa83-0104-4468-b00a-92ee8a659429Cited by top-tier papers2
- Enhancing LLM's Ability to Generate More Repository-Aware Unit Tests Through Precise Context InjectionXin Yin, Chao Ni, Xinrui Li, Liushan Chen et al.ASE 2025 · 2 citations
- IRFuzzer: Specialized Fuzzing for LLVM Backend Code GenerationYuyang Rong, Zhanghan Yu, Zhenkai Weng, Stephen Neuendorffer et al.ICSE 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on7
- CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and GenerationYue Wang, Weishi Wang, Shafiq R. Joty, Steven C. H. HoiEMNLP 2021 · 1,224 citations
- Angora: Efficient Fuzzing by Principled SearchPeng Chen, Hao ChenS&P 2018 · 616 citations
- CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program SynthesisErik Nijkamp, Bo Pang, Hiroaki Hayashi, Lifu Tu et al.ICLR 2023 · 234 citations
- CoderEval: A Benchmark of Pragmatic Code Generation with Generative Pre-trained ModelsHao Yu, Bo Shen, Dezhi Ran, Jiaxin Zhang et al.ICSE 2024 · 107 citations
- On learning meaningful assert statements for unit test casesCody Watson, Michele Tufano, Kevin Moran, Gabriele Bavota et al.ICSE 2020 · 96 citations
Related papers
- UnitCoder: Scalable Code Synthesis from Pre-training CorporaYichuan Ma, Yunfan Shao, Peiji Li, Demin Song et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- Evaluating and Improving ChatGPT for Unit Test GenerationZhiqiang Yuan, Mingwei Liu, Shiji Ding, Kaixin Wang et al.FSE 2024 · 89 citations
- On the Evaluation of Large Language Models in Unit Test GenerationLin Yang, Chen Yang, Shutao Gao, Weijing Wang et al.ASE 2024 · 42 citations
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 citations
- Measuring the Influence of Incorrect Code on Test GenerationDong Huang, Jie M. Zhang, Mark Harman, Mingzhe Du et al.ICSE 2026
