CoderEval: A Benchmark of Pragmatic Code Generation with Generative Pre-trained Models
Hao Yu, Bo Shen, Dezhi Ran, Jiaxin Zhang, Qi Zhang, Yuchi Ma, Guangtai Liang, Ying Li, Qianxiang Wang, Tao Xie
Abstract
Code generation models based on the pre-training and fine-tuning paradigm have been increasingly attempted by both academia and industry, resulting in well-known industrial models such as Codex, CodeGen, and PanGu-Coder. To evaluate the effectiveness of these models, multiple existing benchmarks (e.g., HumanEval and AiXBench) are proposed, including only cases of generating a standalone function, i.e., a function that may invoke or access only built-in functions and standard libraries. However, non-standalone functions, which typically are not included in the existing benchmarks, constitute more than 70% of the functions in popular opensource projects, and evaluating models' effectiveness on standalone functions cannot reflect these models' effectiveness on pragmatic code generation scenarios (i.e., code generation for real settings of open source or proprietary code). To help bridge the preceding gap, in this paper, we propose a benchmark named CoderEval, consisting of 230 Python and 230
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4a7dbfe6-150c-40d6-9350-819ecd5ca7e8Cited by top-tier papers76
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software EngineeringJohn Yang, Carlos E. Jimenez, Alexander Wettig, Kilian Lieret et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 2,059 citations
- OctoPack: Instruction Tuning Code Large Language ModelsNiklas Muennighoff, Qian Liu, Armel Randy Zebaze, Qinkai Zheng et al.ICLR 2024 · 203 citations
- Evaluating Large Language Models in Class-Level Code GenerationXueying Du, Mingwei Liu, Kaixin Wang, Hanlin Wang et al.ICSE 2024 · 118 citations
- Monitor-Guided Decoding of Code LMs with Static Analysis of Repository ContextLakshya A. Agrawal, Aditya Kanade, Navin Goyal, Shuvendu K. Lahiri et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 55 citations
Builds on6
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- WizardCoder: Empowering Code Large Language Models with Evol-InstructZiyang Luo, Can Xu, Pu Zhao, Qingfeng Sun et al.ICLR 2024 · 945 citations
- DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code GenerationYuhang Lai, Chengxi Li, Yiming Wang, Tianyi Zhang et al.ICML 2023 · 504 citations
- InCoder: A Generative Model for Code Infilling and SynthesisDaniel Fried, Armen Aghajanyan, Jessy Lin, Sida Wang et al.ICLR 2023 · 140 citations
Related papers
- ComplexCodeEval: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Code Models on More Complex CodeJia Feng, Jiachen Liu, Cuiyun Gao, Chun Yong Chong et al.ASE 2024 · 7 citations
- ReCode: Robustness Evaluation of Code Generation ModelsShiqi Wang, Zheng Li, Haifeng Qian, Chenghao Yang et al.ACL 2023 · 32 citations
- McEval: Massively Multilingual Code EvaluationLinzheng Chai, Shukai Liu, Jian Yang, Yuwei Yin et al.ICLR 2025 · 1 citation
- Can Language Models Replace Programmers for Coding? REPOCOD Says 'Not Yet'Shanchao Liang, Nan Jiang, Yiran Hu, Lin TanACL 2025 · 9 citations
- Can Large Language Models Write Parallel Code?Daniel Nichols, Joshua Hoke Davis, Zhaojun Xie, Arjun Rajaram et al.HPDC 2024 · 30 citations
