A Large-Scale Empirical Study on Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Unit Testing
Ye Shang, Quanjun Zhang, Chunrong Fang, Siqi Gu, Jianyi Zhou, Zhenyu Chen
Abstract
Unit testing plays a pivotal role in software development, improving software quality and reliability. However, generating effective test cases manually is time-consuming, prompting interest in unit testing research. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown potential in various unit testing tasks, including test generation, assertion generation, and test evolution, but existing studies are limited in scope and lack a systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of LLMs. To bridge this gap, we present a large-scale empirical study on fine-tuning LLMs for unit testing. Our study involves three unit testing tasks, five benchmarks, eight evaluation metrics, and 37 popular LLMs across various architectures and sizes, consuming over 3,000 NVIDIA A100 GPU hours. We focus on three key research questions: (1) the performance of LLMs compared to state-of-the-art methods, (2) the impact of different factors on LLM performance, and (3) the effectiveness of fine-tuning versus prompt engineering. Our findings reveal that LLMs outperform existing state-of-the-art approaches on all three unit testing tasks across nearly all metrics, highlighting the potential of fine-tuning LLMs in unit testing tasks. Furthermore, large-scale, decoder-only models achieve the best results across tasks, while encoder-decoder models perform better under the same parameter scale. Additionally, the comparison of the performance between fine-tuning and prompt engineering approaches reveals the considerable potential capability of the prompt engineering approach in unit testing tasks. We then discuss the concerned issues on the test generation task, including data leakage issues, bug detection capabilities, and metrics comparisons. Finally, we further pinpoint carious practical guidelines for LLM-based approaches to unit testing tasks in the near future. Overall, our work demonstrates the promising future of fine-tuning LLMs on unit testing tasks and reduces the manual efforts of unit testing experts in practical scenarios. CCS Concepts: • Software and its engineering → Software testing and debugging.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- Co-Evolving LLM Coder and Unit Tester via Reinforcement LearningYinjie Wang, Ling Yang, Ye Tian, Ke Shen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 56 citations
- Evaluating and Mitigating the Misguidance Effect of Buggy Code in LLM-Generated Unit TestsJunda Zhao, Shurui Zhou, Eldan CohenISSTA 2026 · 1 citation
- Sakura: An Approach for Generating Complex Tests from Natural Language Test DescriptionsTyler Stennett, Rangeet Pan, Bridget McGinn, Alessandro Orso et al.ISSTA 2026
- An Empirical Study of Speculative Decoding on Software Engineering TasksYijia Li, Junkai Chen, Xing Hu, Xin XiaISSTA 2026
- Do Coverage and Mutation Scores of LLM-Generated Test Suites Correlate with Their Effectiveness? (Replicability Study)Junda Zhao, Shurui Zhou, Eldan CohenISSTA 2026
Builds on16
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and GenerationYue Wang, Weishi Wang, Shafiq R. Joty, Steven C. H. HoiEMNLP 2021 · 1,224 citations
- CodeT5+: Open Code Large Language Models for Code Understanding and GenerationYue Wang, Hung Le, Akhilesh Gotmare, Nghi D. Q. Bui et al.EMNLP 2023 · 339 citations
- Magicoder: Empowering Code Generation with OSS-InstructYuxiang Wei, Zhe Wang, Jiawei Liu, Yifeng Ding et al.ICML 2024 · 246 citations
- CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program SynthesisErik Nijkamp, Bo Pang, Hiroaki Hayashi, Lifu Tu et al.ICLR 2023 · 234 citations
Related papers
- On the Evaluation of Large Language Models in Unit Test GenerationLin Yang, Chen Yang, Shutao Gao, Weijing Wang et al.ASE 2024 · 42 citations
- On the Evaluation of Large Language Models in Unit Test Evolution (Experience Paper)Weichang Liu, Junwei Zhang, Yuqing Niu, Bo ZhouISSTA 2026
- Evaluating and Improving ChatGPT for Unit Test GenerationZhiqiang Yuan, Mingwei Liu, Shiji Ding, Kaixin Wang et al.FSE 2024 · 89 citations
- Test Intention Guided LLM-Based Unit Test GenerationZifan Nan, Zhaoqiang Guo, Kui Liu, Xin XiaICSE 2025 · 5 citations
- Measuring the Influence of Incorrect Code on Test GenerationDong Huang, Jie M. Zhang, Mark Harman, Mingzhe Du et al.ICSE 2026
